605
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

While some contractors dismiss the plan as political rhetoric, many say they can’t afford to lose more people from an aging, immigrant-dependent workforce still short of nearly 400,000 people.

Both presidential candidates promise to build more homes. One promises to deport hundreds of thousands of people who build them.

Former President Donald Trump's pledge to "launch the largest deportation operation in the history of our country" would hamstring construction firms already facing labor shortages and push record home prices higher, say industry leaders, contractors and economists.

"It would be detrimental to the construction industry and our labor supply and exacerbate our housing affordability problems," said Jim Tobin, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders. The trade group considers foreign-born workers, regardless of legal status, "a vital and flexible source of labor" to builders, estimating they fill 30% of trade jobs like carpentry, plastering, masonry and electrical roles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Not always about the wage. You could pay 200k per year and still have trouble finding people willing to climb up on a roof day in and day out.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

Especially if they find out that roofer is the fourth-most dangerous job in the U.S.

https://www.ishn.com/articles/112748-top-25-most-dangerous-jobs-in-the-united-states

Incidentally, police officer is ranked at 22. Well below garbage collectors (5), delivery drivers (7), or agricultural workers (11).

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

delivery drivers (7)

I shudder at the thought of driving for work. It's already so hard to keep up spatial awareness of the crazy drivers for an hour or less. I cannot imagine 8 hours of that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

And on top of all of that, you usually have to provide your own vehicle. Which means you basically drive it to death much earlier than the average lifespan of the car. If we're talking something like Uber Eats, they don't even cover your gas.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I cannot imagine it be a worthwhile investment. The only people I know who do Uber are retired and do it out of boredom. Fortunately, I don't know a single soul who does it for a job (without having another job to do as well).

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

I know I guy who does Door Dash. He says it let's him be his own boss where he can work as much or as little as he wants to. And he said he got tired of dealing with the new generation of workers at his old job.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

If it works for you, that's great. But it's like @FlyingSquid@lemmy.world said, there's so many cons to work for Uber.

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's what an actual Door Dash driver has told me, and I would think he would be aware of the downsides of the business. He has told me his war stories and despite all of the cons he thinks it is better for him then working in his old job sector. It seems pretty telling. edit: typos

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I see. It could be easier for your friend to work with clients over other coworkers. There's nothing wrong with that.

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

What's surprising about it is that two attributes outweighs all of the upsides of being a full-time employee and the downsides of an enshittified business model that makes you pay for your own gas. It speaks to how important and valuable work-life balance and coworker interactions are. edit: typo

Companies should seek to provide at least the first and higher wages. I'm not sure what companies can do about generational differences, maybe different shifts, but that seems like it wouldn't be feasible in every case. Maybe more training. He made it sound like an attitude problem though. =/

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I don't know anyone lately, but I know plenty of people who did it when they were younger. Including a trandgender friend who did it for maybe 20 years. I'm guessing she doesn't have a lot of job opportunities here in Indiana. She's such an awesome person too.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago
[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

There must be a good reason why why family quit 11! I'll trust their judgement on this one.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

The way I see it, there's two options:

  1. Pay people more. 300k, 400k, 500k, whatever it takes. Surely there's a number that people would feel is worth the risk. The obvious downside is that increases the cost of construction.

  2. Make the process of roofing safer - invent new safety gear or safety practices, automation equipment that can be operated from the ground, introduce legislation that encourages those practices or subsidizes the new equipment. The obvious downside is this requires upfront investment and cooperation between government and industry.

Either way, the current practice of "throw cheap immigrant labor at it until it goes away" is not tenable.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

It’s not just “cheap” immigrant labor. Those laborers bring ability that you have a very hard time finding here.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 8 points 12 hours ago

Then the wages are still too low...

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

It really is not that simple.

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

It really IS that simple. You tell some schmuck off the street "I will pay you $300K a year to climb on roofs and nail down shingles all day.", you really think they'll say no? I don't. Same with retail, same with food service, same with sales, painting, engineering, and more.

Historically underpaying job markets aren't experiencing a """"labor shortage"""" from lack of openings or bad press, they're just finally realizing that paying people like shit then treating them poorly isn't going to get them more workers.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

They will say no especially when they hear his dangerous it is. My uncle fell off the roof and ended up with a hernia. It took forever to do the surgery to fix it. And really, 300k? How expensive do you think that's going to make a house? As much as I hate the idea there's only so much that you can charge for something. We'd have to somehow go after the corporation for unprecedented profit in addition to raising wages.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

They’ll say yes. They won’t last long. The churn will be great and then there will be shortage. It really isn’t as simple as pay.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

So your solution is an impoverished underclass that cannot escape work no one will do, you are sick.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago
[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

And by that logic no country in the world would have soldiers either.

People have been doing dangerous jobs for pay since the existence of pay. If the pay is right someone will perform your dangerous job. If the payout isn't worth the risk then they won't. It's the free market in action.

[-] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

The free market currently says that a new home is worth X dollars because of what people are willing to pay vs. the labor going into it. Materials are cheap compared to the work. The rates laborers get paid stem from the free market equilibrium on that. Labor rates go up, house prices go up, home ownership goes down. Builders in the US get about 15% margin on building and selling new homes. You have maybe 10% of wiggle room before the profit in building homes is not worth the effort. So laborers could get paid...10% more at best before home prices go up. That's not going to attract many more people to offset immigrant labor demand.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

The people who have to work at low wages bc of legal and social suppression are effecting the market equalibrum. Labor costs are just as real a factor in the market as anything.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

I have known enough growers and builders that no matter the pay, people cannot simply will themselves able to do that kind of work. It’s just.Not.That.Simple.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

But yet crops still get planted and harvested and buildings still get built.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
605 points (97.9% liked)

News

23190 readers
2934 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS