895
Nevar Forget (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago

I might be misremembering the electoral values of the states here, but I think the combined value of the states they’re not official write ins or on ballot is only 64.

That leaves 474 electoral votes that psl could get, so they very much could win.

The history of the party is easy to find. They’ve been around for a little while now.

I’d choose a party with no track record over one with a consistent track record of genocidal violence and extrajudicial killings, but luckily psl has a track record of grassroots activism that’s pretty consistent, so I don’t have to take a gamble.

It’s a bit absurd to call opposition to genocide and apartheid unproven, untested policy.

I’m swiftly climbing the ladder of age and my whole life people have been saying “well, you should have been advocating for this or that last year, it’s too late now, this is the most important election of our lifetime!”

The best time to vote (and do groundwork for) psl was last year, the second best time is now!

I agree with the last part though, don’t listen to people peddling tired cliches and misinformation trying to manipulate you into voting one way or the other!

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

News flash genius…. Most everyone here is opposed to genocide. As has been said before, you’re not part of some fringe grassroots group that figured out that genocide was bad ahead of everyone else.

Stop with that shit. I don’t believe you’re here in any good faith to help anyone in any way.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

If most everyone is opposed to genocide then I agree with them and want to help them find parties and candidates that oppose it too, like psl!

What party in opposition to genocide do you support?

I’m not going to stop politely and courteously advocating for the party and candidate I think is appropriate in threads where it’s on topic in a political comm.

It might not be a good idea to accuse people of bad faith when you open up with a sarcastic insult. World is pretty strict about that stuff, it’s like their number one rule.

[-] turtletracks@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

America is a two party system.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -2 points 13 hours ago

Someone should tell it there’s all these other parties then.

[-] turtletracks@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago

With the way our system is set up, a third party will never win. Especially when 50% of America is still backing Trump. We need a new voting system before anything can change

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 13 hours ago

Even for a losing party, vote tallies are used to determine access to funding, events, media and help to raise public awareness.

We gotta start somewhere.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml -2 points 13 hours ago

Or we could just vote third party and convince conservatives to vote third party as well?

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Most adults are against throwing away votes on untested, unproven clowns.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I accused you of bad faith because that’s what I think you are. And I think the PSL is hot garbage and that’s why no one is taking them seriously.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -2 points 16 hours ago

Is there an argument I could make from my position that wouldn’t read as bad faith to you?

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago

You’re here trying to garner support for the hopeless psl within weeks of an election, so….

No.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago

I was trying to garner support for the psl here months before the election too, and years before it in real life organizing.

Just for the sake of completeness, if you can’t see a persons position as having a good faith form, doesn’t that mean you’re the person here in bad faith? If you truly believed there was no earnest true believer doctrinaire communist that was committed to their party of choice because they really thought it was the best use of their and everyone else’s time, wouldn’t you just report me as misinformation or whatever and move on?

I’ve always considered bad faith to be not the person I disagree with but the person who isnt willing to engage with anything I’m saying, to assume that there’s a human being on the other side of the capacitive predictive text thumb pad and that they have reasons behind what they’re saying that are worth listening to.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Not when they’re actively trying to undermine an election.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 hours ago

It’s not clear from your comment, who is actively trying to undermine an election, me or the party for socialism and liberation?

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml -3 points 13 hours ago

Most everyone here is opposed to genocide.

Most everyone here is also voting for the Democrats, instead of agreeing to vote for a third party who is opposed to genocide

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Again… everyone is against genocide. Your bad faith accusations aren’t working on anyone anymore. It’s just… cringy as fuck now.

And so you know- the third party clowns currently running have no viable end game to shut shit down over there. Go ahead and look it up. They say they do- but have no clear answer on how they’d do it that is even remotely viable. But it all looks good to the smug edgelords that think they’re somehow unique because they are against dOiNg gEnoCiDes!

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 hour ago

What part of cutting military funding by 90% (Claudia de la Cruz's platform) would fail to stop funding Israel?

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
895 points (84.9% liked)

Political Memes

5357 readers
2952 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS