24
submitted 4 weeks ago by PanArab@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Democrats aren't attacking Jill Stein because they think she is taking votes from Kamala Harris. No one I know who's voting Green would consider a vote for Harris at this point. They're attacking Jill Stein because they don't want voters to know that there can be a worker-centered party to the left of the Democrats that supports popular policies like Medicare for All, a $25 wage and federally guaranteed housing.

There are 80+ million eligible voters who don't vote at all because they don't see the point. Democrats are okay with this, in fact, they don't want any candidate to their left to appeal to those voters with popular policies.

The fact that the Green Party exists shows that the Democrats aren't pushing the most progressive policies. Jill Stein's candidacy shows that it's possible to support reproductive justice AND be against funding and arming a genocide. That we can end homelessness if we stopped funding endless wars around the globe.

Democrats don't want anyone to the left of them to exist because it's the only way they can convince Americans that Dem policies are "the best that we can do". To Dems, anything else is just "asking for a pony".

Don't fall for it. Despite Dem's desire to have you think otherwise, things don't have to be this way.

Another world is possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Barabas@hexbear.net 22 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

As the old guard gets replaced, the hope is that we bring in more and more liberal people over time.

We just today had the poster child of the "new guard" of the democrats coming out and talking about how great it is that nothing happens now. While we are one year into a genocide. While we are further building the wall and enforcing all the border policies that she went down to the border to have a photo op crying at.

Do you think AOC will save anyone? She'll just go back to brunch while the world burns.

Voting third party is ineffective no matter how you look at it, at least not in the Presidential election.

If you can't see further than a single election cycle ahead I guess. Consistently voting for the "lesser evil" will only make the "lesser evil" more evil. If there is a voting bloc that is strong enough to apparently scupper the democrats maybe they should try to appeal to them in any way rather than court the people voting for the "greater evil"?

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thought you were talking about Pete. He pretty clearly seems like the one the blues are grooming to take over next. He's well-spoken and probably a much safer pick for liberals than AOC.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
24 points (59.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7231 readers
148 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS