142
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by sexywheat@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

It's exceedingly effective.

I was talking politics with someone earlier today, on the topic of the new BRICS payment system, and the conversation went something like this:

Me: Countries should be able to trade in their own currencies, and no one country (USA or otherwise) should be able to declare unilateral sanctions and cause sabotage just because they want to.

Lib: Shouldn't USA be able to sanction Russia for its invasion of Ukraine?

Me: I don't think any country should be able to declare unilateral sanctions. On the other hand, if the global community wants to decide on sanctions together, that's another story. However, maybe the USA themselves should be sanctioned for their involvement in the 2014/2015 coup in Ukraine that started this whole mess.

Lib: Were those democratic protesters not legitimate?

Me: It was a far right, violet coup that overthrew a democratically elected government [Provides sourced examples of far-right violence during the coup, evidence it was a coup, and how it was clearly in the interests of Western governments]

Lib: [Provides Wikipedia links of the "Democratic mass movements in Ukraine"]

Me: Yes that is a textbook example of a CIA backed colour revolution.

Lib: That is Russian disinformation.

Why exactly does "disinformation" always have to come from "the other, evil foreign governments"? Why the fuck does Russia care what I think? Wouldn't it make a lot more fucking sense that our own government is trying to manipulate our understanding of the world?

I don't think I have ever once heard a lib use the term "American disinformation" or "misinformation from our own government" - it's always the evil Russians or Chinese. Of course reactionaries and chuds always cry foul at what the government says but it's only about dumb bullshit like vaccines and bike lanes.

The second any information runs contrary to the Libs heavily propagandised worldview it can immediately be dismissed as "foreign propaganda" - no matter how thoroughly sourced or researched or documented. It's just an immediate off switch for both the conversation and their brain. And, conveniently, they have handy NATOpedia articles to counter with.

Anyway, thanks for coming to my TED Talk. Don't forget to like and subscribe.

Free Palestine 🇵🇸

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 15 points 7 hours ago

That's because the Atlantic powers have been shitting their pants over "Russian encroachment on Europe" since Napoleon lost at waterloo. These nations literally don't believe Russia deserves to be considered European. Whether due to racism or greed that opinion still dominates. Personally I think a significant amount of it is geopolitical fear. Being a major land-based Eurasian power, the Atlanticist domination of the seas strategy doesn't work so well on Russia. And if they can't control russia, they have to contain it. The west wanted this war to happen just to stick a spike in Russia's tire, Ukrainians be damned. NATO was formed as an anti-Russian alliance after all, now they have their purpose back. If you listen to them you'd think a country never fought a war before Russia. The rest of the world sees Russia as just another major power, which it is. :chigurh-glare:

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
142 points (97.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
1000 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS