241

After almost 3 years of work, I've finally managed to get this project stable enough to release an alpha version!

I'm proud to present Managarr - A TUI and CLI for managing your Servarr instances! At the moment, the alpha version only supports Radarr.

Not all features are implemented for the alpha version, like managing quality profiles or quality definitions, etc.

Here's some screenshots of the TUI:

Additionally, you can use it as a CLI for Radarr; For example, to search for a new film:

managarr radarr search-new-movie --query "star wars"

Or you can add a new movie by its TMDB ID:

managarr radarr add movie --tmdb-id 1895 --root-folder-path /nfs/movies --quality-profile-id 1

All features available in the TUI are also available via the CLI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

But that implies you do have your SSH open to the world, right?

The way I access my private web interfaces remotely is through something like Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier. Same thing for SSH. No way in hell am I opening 22 on my router.

[-] choco@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You are not wrong, most of the time I SSH from the same IP so I only have 22 open from this adress. I think I just prefer managing this one access protected by a big key without thinking about my reverse proxy, plus I think TUI are neat. But objectively you are right, there may not be a lot of advantages.

Thanks to the developers though, I always appreciate such hard work and sharing to the community ♥️

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

You can use any port for ssh. When I switched from 22 to 1337, brute force attempts at logging in stopped

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Obscurity is not the same thing as security.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

Well I use key-based login for security; obscurity just keeps the network congestion down

[-] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 day ago

Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier

No way in hell i am giving a company complete remote access to my servers and clients.

[-] DesolateMood@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

All these companies do is make it easier to use wireguard, if you're so afraid of them just use wireguard yourself, you'll get the same effect

[-] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

This is not really correct. Those companies take complete control of the secret keys. And no, it is not the same effect when you use tailscale compared to wireguard cause of various reasons. CGNAT, no port forwarding, funnels etc.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know those can be self hosted, right?

And yes, by all means just set up your own Wireguard or OpenVPN access if that's what you prefer. You do you bud.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
241 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

39677 readers
460 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS