330
Conrroversial (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 109 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"A complete consistency (either within the compass of the Silmarillion itself or between The Silmarillion and other published writings of my father's) is not to be looked for, and could only be achieved, if at all, at heavy and needless cost."

  • Christopher Tolkien
    The Silmarillian Forward, 1977
[-] WillBalls@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

It's similar to searching for consistencies amongst any mythology, which is what Tolkien was attempting to create. Tales will always change over time, and they'll always shift focus to what the teller determines is important. As focuses of a society shift, so do the focuses of its related mythology. In this way, I think Tolkien did an excellent job creating a united mythos for England in all the different versions of his legendarium. As the tales evolved, consistencies emerged elements which were formerly key, were discarded, and internal references became more commonplace than external references (see Tolkien's influences from William Morris and Icelandic, Celtic, Germanic, and Anglo Saxon epics)

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

That was the challenge Christopher noted in the forward to the Silmarillion. J.R.R. had started working it in 1917, and kept making changes right up until his death in 1973.

So he had 56 years worth of papers, and notes, lots of it hand written, to try to kind of reconcile into a single work.

[-] WillBalls@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

It's been a few years since I've read the foreword to the Silmarillion, but I'm glad I'm consistent with Christopher's analysis 😁

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Helps that I literally just read it the day before this post! LOL.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Needless cost?

That is just so what a nerd (Tolkien) would say about other needs nerding out.

Just let us nerd, ok?!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think he means in terms of time. In order to make it fully consistent, you'd have to have some kind of index and go through line by line making sure everything is saying the same thing.

Oh, wait...

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think he means in terms of the content you would have to discard. An idea is described ten times one way, but described once beautifully another way. To choose a consistent description is to “lose” the unique one.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
330 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12655 readers
2300 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS