Sometimes I doubt wether John Oliver is employed directly by the american state, and then he'll release a video like this (www.youtube.com)

submitted 2 months ago by REgon@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not that I don't enjoy a good takedown video, but it's just so incredibly obvious

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 43 points 2 months ago

He's not exactly employed by the state, but by the establishment controlling the state. Subtle but important difference.

[-] REgon@hexbear.net 31 points 2 months ago

Yeah I just didn't want to write something like "the deep state" because it would summon an infinite number of smuglord lemmitor

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

And not to attack you, but ya "the deep state" can be a dog-whistle for antisemitism.

[-] REgon@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yeah that too was a reason, no attack perceived

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't see a meaningful difference between the two. Much like I don't see how "thinktanks" that provide policy to the state are not part of the state itself. It's effectively the privatisation of branches of state. They're still the state, just under absolute complete and total capital-control with absolutely zero potential for "democratic" machinations to affect them.

[-] Venat@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

Isn't that the state though? The state is the avatar, the apparatus, the tool and apparatus of the dominant political class of a given polity. It doesn't necessarily need to be a government position, agency, or NGO/NPO connected thereof.