398
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by otter@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22332949

JD Vance said that ‘American power comes with certain strings attached’

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

There's still that little issue of building up your own. Most EU countries have been demilitarizing for 30 years more and more, with the strategy being "it's a new world without wars, and also big daddy USA will protect us, and if not them, then Britain and France will". Britain has done an exit, and France alone is kinda lazy.

[-] tutus@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago

Most EU countries have been demilitarizing for 30 years more and more, with the strategy being "it's a new world without wars, and also big daddy USA will protect us,l

That's not the Europe I see now and sounds like a US President trope. I would agree that post-Cold War that was the case, but I'd say in the last decade at least, it's not.

But, genuine question as I'm open to being wrong, saved this is an area that interests me, do you have sources for this?

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Yeah, the person above isn't being accurate at all.

While here in the UK we rely heavily on the US for control of Trident, the US dropping NATO support would just require additional defence spending and closer alignment with Europe. If Trump is bought by Russia, Putin would see this as a Very Bad Thing, and would want to keep the US in the fold because even with the US NATO would likely steamroll Russia.

The Trump dynamic is somewhat problematic, should it fester elsewhere in Europe. Globalisation was an important trait to maintain for the US, whereas most populist movements move towards buying local or supporting national interests above all else. Europe is largely self-sufficient, even in defence, so Trump would probably cut off huge numbers of imports/exports just to prop up Elon's shitty cars.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

the british military slashed budgets considerably after 2008. we've maintained special forces and we decomissioned our last carrier before its replacement was ready. we're back up to 2 carriers now but dont have enough planes to put on them.

we have virtually no stockpiles of artillery and our land forces are small.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

From an entirely selfish perspective, the UK has very few threats militarily, unless the French decide to invade again.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

Russia have demonstrated the ability to carry out chemical weapons attacks on mainland UK soil.

if a full on exchange we would be out of air defence ammunition very quickly.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 4 days ago

Empire is long dead and it is an island, this ain't wrong... Remaining colonit don't justify too much posture anyway.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Nah. It's a trope all right.

"For 20 years" is fine.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

Britain has in no way done an exit. Going out of a trade and economic union has nothing to do with their military commitments.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

To defense as part of NATO - yes.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
398 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
1453 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS