116
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Those 800 wind turbines can be built in a month. Building a nuclear plant takes decades. And nuclear fuel reprocessing had never been economical by a long shot. Your pipe dreams will always regain just that and that's before we even start talking about proliferation and nuclear waste.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago
[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And in those 6 years, you could have built over 6x that capacity in renewables, easy.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

You can also built more than 1 reactor at the same time

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

The same can be said of any power source?

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

Sure, but the other commenter conveniently forgot that that's the case for nuclear as well

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

You could, but with that colossal amount of resources you could have built 12x in renewables, probably more because of economy of scale.

And if you decide to commit all those resources to renewables, you probably just created a booming local industry of well paying jobs.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago

But then you still haven't solved any of the issues with renewables (at least solar and wind); The amount of space they take up, their inconsistent power output and power grids which haven't been designed for them.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It saddens me that we're here dealing with a push for obsolete, untenable solutions, and all the while, China keeps solving your "impossible issues" on the daily:

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20241113-will-chinas-ultra-high-voltage-grid-pay-off-for-renewable-power

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
116 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32315 readers
794 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS