116
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bastion@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

This is a much more reasonable argument than most.

But third and fourth-gen nuclear are excellent sources of constant energy that don't require storage, and some of which have a tiny percentage of the waste stream of prior generations, and what waste they do produce is problematic along the lines of 400 years (as opposed to 27,000 years).

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Third and fourth gen can also use the waste that's currently being warehoused as well. So they'll be reducing environmental impact that's caused by the current waste stream.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 6 hours ago
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
116 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32315 readers
794 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS