50
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

Couldn't find any good sources in English, but thought it might be interesting to let y'all know.

Edit: ITT: Brazilians arguing in English.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MatBC@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I have no faith in that party, although I have much less in PCO, I just think that the streets are much too valuable a space to be left to the right to be the only occupied by the right. We need to fight for what is fair and what benefits the workers, and reducing working hours is about as clearly a good goal as they come, to be against that seems very concerning.

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Pco is the only party that put people on the street about gaza. Is that an important issue? Because boulos said more or less he doest give a fuck about it

[-] MatBC@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah when did I say I support Boulos or that I'm a fan of PSOL? That's right I didn't and you can go ahead turning the blind eye to everything wrong PCO does, in this very post there's plenty, so you are either so fully enamored with the party that you simply don't believe the facts or you are someone that knows all the dirt and either don't care or agree, in any of the possibilities there is no prospect for a reasonable conversation, you will keep using PSOL as a reason to try to cool down a movement that has a lot of possibility, it carries some risk, every movement does, opportunists are always a concern, you for one must know them very well, but if we live in fear of opportunism we will live frozen allowing the right to keep growing, we (and I absolutely do not include you in this) need to seize this chance to advance real impactful participation of left forces in contact with the people, and please by all means keep PCO out of this movement, you are not missed.

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago
[-] MatBC@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As eloquent as I expected.

And very didactic that when the debate runs from the expected structure, of which you already have answers(most likely thought of by other people) at the ready you resort to trying(? Or at least I think it is) to discredit the whole thing, not a single argument not a single original thought, not an ounce of analytical thinking. You demonstrate perfectly why we don't like the organization that you either defend or is a part of.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2317 readers
117 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS