6
submitted 1 week ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

The British spooks who gathered around Project Alchemy reasoned that the longer the proxy war continued, the more Russian president Vladimir Putin’s “credibility at home and abroad drops, and his ability to fight NATO is degraded.”

Well, yeah. Don’t we all know that is the MO anyway? And not like it’s against Ukraine’s interests. Zelensky could surrender today if he wanted.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

This. Ignoring the questionable source.

Other than denying Kerch bridge has anything to do with the UK. And they have provided 0 evidence to indicate it was.

Nothing they claim in any way disagrees with the UK open policy on Ukraine. Even if the UK blow Kerch bridge. It would be seen as supporting Ukraine's own desire to keep their territory. Rather than anyway, proving that Ukraine would want to surrender without the UK "Plotting to keep them fighting"

Nothing here at all disagrees with the goals openly declared by the UK government. Under both current and previose leadership.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
6 points (57.1% liked)

World News

32352 readers
407 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS