94
submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by Bureaucrat@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Jeremy failson more like. Dickhead buys a farm to dodge taxes, then gets pissy when the tax dode loophole gets a teeny tiny bit more ~~fiddlycult~~ ~~difficult~~ fiddlycult to loo.
Jere not my son more like. jemorony clackson more like

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Huldra@hexbear.net 36 points 15 hours ago

The answer is obvious but I still have to ask if the farmers have no real shame in their body?

Who would want to be represented by a television dickhead who bought a farm and then when the contracted local retired, decided that he would do it himself as reality tv and promptly renamed the farm to "diddly squat".

Like you wouldnt be offended if you werent a farmer, but if you can imagine being one then wouldn't you find it a little distasteful for some dickhead with money to roll in and make a big joke out of it?

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 32 points 14 hours ago

Most farmers (who aren't farm hands/workers) in the imperial core are essentially petty bourgeoisie. They have the same class interests as the ruling class.

[-] urmums401k@hexbear.net 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

So, in the UK they have special ancestral bullshit about land ownership, and agricultural land is extra special and has all sorts of tax and inheritance gimmees that the oligarchs use to do oligarch things.

They dont 'have the same interests'; its literally the same people.

The same way american farmers are, by area, mostly corporations, but scammier

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 26 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

100% of the farmers in this protest are petty-bourgeoisie. They are protesting because the changes are likely going to force them to sell their farms, these sales will go to much bigger farms.

What's happening is essentially the petty-bourgeoisie being squeezed by the bourgeoisie.

[-] Huldra@hexbear.net 10 points 13 hours ago

Oh yes definitely, but don't they have some invented mythology and folksy pride to them?

Have they all just beocome indistinguishable from finance worms and the other standard ghouls?

[-] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 10 points 13 hours ago

Well you see they get a lot of money from the government and they're all massively in debt as long as they don't sell their land, but if they do they're millionaires, but they don't, so that means they're working class

[-] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 22 points 15 hours ago

They think Jezza is cool and the man. My brain melted when I saw he had a an article published in a newspaper in Britain, and it started pouring out of my ears when I realised he was a regular columnist. He had an actual column in an actual newspaper and it wasn't about cars and farts, but politics.

[-] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 28 points 14 hours ago

Top Gear becomes less fun when you realize Clarkson means what he says - the ignorant caricature of a right winger that he plays is not too dissimilar from his actual views.

[-] monobot@lemmy.ml 7 points 12 hours ago

I thought the same at the beginning, but after working for few years in agriculture, he is actually presenting real problems every farmer has, not only British bourgeoisie.

He put more spotlight on farming issues than all non profit organisations together.

Of course they support him. Yeah he is a bit crazy and looks disrespectful on the first look, but give it a chance he is actually highlighting even ecological issues around farming.

[-] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 14 points 15 hours ago

but he was on TV! Could there be anything more important? trump-enlightened

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
94 points (97.0% liked)

news

23563 readers
865 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS