148
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by micnd90@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Biden is a lame duck president with NO PUBLIC MANDATE and subterranean approval rating, he got ousted by his own party before the election for being mentally incapacitated, his defense against a Justice Department inquiry is he's too old and senile, his party just got BTFO in a national election. No NATO or NATO proxies have ever launched long range missiles into Russia in living memory. How is this guy brump fit for office

STOP EATING CRAYONS AND DO YOUR FUCKING JERB. "Senile old man sends young people to WW3 out of spite"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 42 points 1 week ago

Russia won't escalate to nuclear, but it will have to escalate, which is going to ruin the rest of Ukraine all for a chance of getting more intelligence on Russian capabilities.

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

small price to pay for the US. Not like anyone in Ukraine can complain. Not like any westerner ever sees anything about the consequences. Not like the lackeys "in charge" in Ukraine will say anything about it. The US will just pay off their most loyal puppets and move on to the next country to destroy.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

How will Russia escalate further? They are already doing almost everything they can, including deploying troops in Ukraine from other countries like NK, and indiscriminate bombing of civilian centers in Ukraine.

Russia has no capability to escalate the war besides nukes, which they won't use. It's amusing y'all think this is a big deal, it's not and nothing will happen. The US should have approved these strikes the minute we supplied the weapons in the first place.

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Russia has 10x more personnel and equipment not being used in any way or form in this war. They can double the forces and go harder on the offensive.

Sources: Am in Russia, business is as usual for the most part.

Additional source: My nephews who boasted achieving best results in class at riffle re-assembly. Meaning that this soviet-era class is revived and that there is at least a couple dozen rifles in every single school across the country, being used as child's toys.

EDIT: Fuck, it's even worse than I expected — he just launched a motherfucking ICBM, that crazy old bastard.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Troops from DPRK have not been in Ukraine, they are only in Russia. They also don’t indiscriminately bomb civilian areas, that’s Ukraine. It’s clear you have gotten a distorted and biased stream of information on what this war has entailed. If Russia was so desperate, why are they winning on all fronts? What are you even talking about? Russia could easily flatten all of Kiev and Lviv overnight if they just carpet bombed them like you claim they do. That’s how Israel and the US fights, not Russia.

Russia slowly pushes an advance with artillery and only uses precise missile strikes on weapon depots, drone manufacturing, energy, oil depots, etc behind the front-lines. Civilians evacuate from these areas and they become grayzone in the frontlines, with monthlong artillery duels going on and pushes with a couple dozen armored vehicles. They use drones to attrition enemy supply lines.

None of this is "indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas" there's always a military target.

Whereas Israel and the US just do indiscriminate air strikes taking out city blocks until the entire populated area is reduced to rubble. They did this throughout Asia and the Middle East. This kills tens to hundreds of thousands of civilians per month. The Russia-Ukrainian war has gone on 3+ years and has less civilian casualties than Israel's recent massacres since Al Aqsa Flood which are 1/3 as old.

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hopefully they'll provide Ansarallah with advanced weapons which will lead to very cool things happening in and around the red sea.

EDIT: or they could just start using non-nuclear weapons on NATO assets themselves

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz -2 points 1 week ago

The red sea stuff would be interesting and a more realistic option, but they won't strike NATO because NATO would easily wipe the floor with Russia.

Russia's 3 day invasion has turned into a multi year disaster because they can't fight against decade old NATO tech, they know they aren't capable of besting NATO

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago

We have already seen what a NATO vs. Russia war looks like, in Ukraine, and Russia won

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

xD NATOs decade old stock pile has expoused Russia as the worlds weaakear super power

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

Are Patriot SAMs “old stock piles”? How about HIMARs? Keep coping, it’s NATOs main tech that has been defeated. If they had better drones, they would have used them by now

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 0 points 6 days ago

Yes HIMARS is old, Ukraine doesn't have anywhere near any of the latest missiles for the HIMARA system. In fact, I think all the ATACMS we sent them are end of life and we're about to be decommissioned.

Patriot is newer and has been working well, they just don't have enough systems to cover all of Ukraine.

You seem to be the one coping, I haven't once stated Ukraine has won or is winning and you keep saying Russia is winning when if you look at all the open source data, it's obvious both sides are taking massive losses and nobody is winning.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

Russia has knocked out over a dozen Patriot missile batteries. Russian missiles have free reign over all Ukrainian skies without any anti-air defense. You are in a deluded world. Russia is not taking "massive losses" that's made up fake cope from Western Media.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 0 points 6 days ago

xD okay, you've convinved me NATO lost and so did the west, I'm moving to Russia or NK. Maybe Belarus, It's hard to pick since the quality of life is so much worse in all of those countries than almost the entire west, but I can't live in a loser country like this anymore.

Do you live in one of these beautiful countries?

[-] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Honestly, I would rather live in North Korea or Russia than in this slowly crumbling empire shithole founded on genocide, slavery, eugenics, and the perfecting of exploitation, surrounded by the most pasty, pathetic, and propagandized motherfuckers the world has ever known, which you are testament to seeing as you thought Ukraine was winning this, lol. Of course I would have to give up a lot of treats to live in NK, but the treats here are mostly garbage anyway, and at least I'd have an actual sense of community and not have to exist as an atomized drone in a rotting wasteland of billboards, fast"food" franchises and traffic-jammed SUVs from horizon to horizon. Moving to Russia would probably feel like a mostly lateral shift in QoL, but it must be nice to live in a country with a rich history of killing nazis instead of saving, funding, idolizing, and actually you know, being nazis.

Whatever though. It sure was fun watching @Z_Poster365@hexbear.net completely fucking school you on basic shit your coping ass kept pathetically trying to deny.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I mean once again I never said Ukraine was winning, why do you guys keep making things up?

But Z_Poster did convince me that NATO lost, so you know you guys win. I'm convinced!

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

You probably thought Ukraine was winning for 2 years, listening to your western sources, and now are totally confused why everyone now admits Russia has won, even your own sources.

Don't you ever question why the entire war turned upside down in an instant and people with shovels somehow defeated NATO?

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Other than Ukraine where Russia has gradually ground the UAF into dust when is the last time NATO equipment and tactics were used against a near peer?

All NATO troops know how to do is massacre civilians and bomb militias.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz -2 points 1 week ago

You think Russia is a peer to NATO? xD

In this hypothetical situation where NATO and Russia fight, I really don't think much man-to-man combat would happen. It would all be advanced weapons systems and drones, which Russia is significantly behind (decades) NATO.

UAF has been ground in to dust but so has the Russian Armed Forces, at worst they are equally dust

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Russian missile and drone technology is ahead of NATO. The west doesn’t even have hypersonic glides. Fucking DPRK has more advanced missiles than the US. You are woefully out of your depth here

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Dang here I thought I just disagreed with you folks but your coming out spitting strait brain rot. Brother Russia can't even produce semiconductors that are of this decades vintage, the DPRK can't produce any advanced technology at all, and you think they can make superior weapons?

I believe Russia's most advanced fabs can produce 90-nanometer chips, while the rest of the world is making sub 5 nanometer chips. Your cope is amusing

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

Americans don’t have hypersonic missiles. DPRK does. I never said Russia was ahead in chip production but they don’t need to be, China will provide everything in that regard. They have better rocketry, better drones, better mass production, better logistics

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
148 points (83.6% liked)

news

23575 readers
926 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS