554
New Rule (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 month ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 23 points 1 month ago

Some of these are valid to ban (the sex and manosphere ones) but others just seem like they're trying to ban slang.

[-] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Also why ban ligma? What if someone catches it and needs to talk about it.

[-] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Just like Joe :(

If it's an language/literature class, maybe it would make sense to ban slang

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago

Ban using slang in writing makes sense, but controlling how students can speak is just ridiculous.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree. Thinking more about it, if you look at the board it shows hand written, a typo count. Which may indicate it is a typing class. Thereby they would be possibly teaching professional typing for a work environment.

So telling users not to talk about pop culture, use slang, emojis, and memes would make sense in that environment.

I personally prefer to use some, but knowing how not to and "knowing your audience" would depict when it is or is not appropriate. So teaching students to say type a professional email/cover letter/resume/response would make sense to ban such. 🤷 <Devils advocate I suppose. Sorry, been a rough week

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

how does it make sense to ban slang in language/literature class???
that's like banning research papers in physics class, wtf

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
554 points (98.8% liked)

196

16748 readers
2599 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS