269
submitted 16 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

I don't find whole team standups have much value aside from being checkpoints. In my experience, it's best to split up projects into tasks that can be worked on in isolation. People directly working on those tasks can organically figure out how they want to get them done and communicate with each other. The sync points can then be used to check the overall state of the project and to track critical path tasks across teams to make sure nobody is blocked.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

That really only works with a mature and experienced team, which is great when you have one.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I find you need to have at least a few experienced people on any effective team otherwise it's just blind leading the blind. Pairing junior people with seniors to act as mentors tends to work well. It also lets senior developers grow. I find this works well because people tend to enjoy having ownership of their tasks.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
269 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32559 readers
621 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS