45

Time to do your thing, frenchies

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 months ago

A one-sided proxy world war. Fucking wild

[-] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 months ago

There was pretty direct involvement of both sides in Afghanistan (in the 80s), Vietnam, and especially Korea. It's bad, but at least it's not wholly unprecedented.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 months ago

The USSR was a hegemon back then. So it could engage in "symmetrical" proxy wars. This is a new situation, I think, where the USA, UK, and France able to act through far more proxies than either Russia or China can.

[-] PostingInternational@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 months ago

Yes, but US/UK never directly bombed/struck the USSR soil or vice versa, so it is unprecedented.

[-] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 months ago
[-] PostingInternational@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

lol ok debatebro, but obviously it was comparison with Cold War 1.0. Pretty sure they didn’t have nukes in Russian civil war.

[-] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago
[-] PostingInternational@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 3 months ago

And yet you continue with your liberal debatebro pedantry. Sad.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2480 readers
143 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS