559
Nothing to see here. (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 2 days ago by xia@lemmy.sdf.org to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 57 points 2 days ago

They're not winning over the blind again after they limited access to screen-reader-accessible apps.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

On the flip side, training ai for image recognition has the potential for auto labelling images for the blind

Could be either the website owners themselves generate them if a human written one isn't provided, or a browser extension that auto labels any unlabelled images on the screen

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They're probably going to make a deal with Google to improve Google Lens. Yes, it will eventually help the blind but Reddit's shareholders will be getting even richer from people's donated time.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Anybody can use the data as long as it's public facing. It's not because websites like reddit and getty stomp their feet and want us to pay that we have to.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_datasets_for_machine-learning_research

Reddit is already in every llm model. Until the courts say otherwise clearly (and I highly doubt they will), it's fair game as it should be.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
559 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

45755 readers
946 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS