[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 52 minutes ago

Al the Age of Empires games, apart from AoE1 DE, are excellent.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 53 minutes ago

In classic Microsoft style, "Xbox" doesn't necessarily mean the console. It's also the name of their gaming service and the store you can use to buy games on Windows.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 10 hours ago

Play the clarinet and you'll be hitting Gs without even trying.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 15 hours ago

I don't even care about the privacy aspect per se. Phone number as user ID is a crappy UX that fundamentally does not work when international travel, multiple devices, or needing to get a number changed. It also doesn't work for shared accounts or people who might want multiple identities.

Some of these relate to privacy, secondarily, but my primary concern is the UX.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 23 points 16 hours ago

Rumour is it's literally only there as an olive branch to hardware manufacturers to force people to buy new hardware. There's literally no technical reasons for it.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 76 points 16 hours ago

Hey Microsoft, if you want me to upgrade to Windows 11, you could start by removing the completely arbitrary requirement to have TPM 2.0.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

I advocated for defederation of ML. But unfortunately my instance's admins are totally ok with their admins' behaviour, even when it does violate ML's own rules.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 22 points 23 hours ago

There is no expectation of privacy in public.

By which I mean that things like blurring a house from Street View are unreasonable.

1
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago

Kyle the Scott. A Scottish cisman with a kinda effeminate voice who once did a dramatic shirt rip to prove he is in fact cis, in the middle of a half hour essay about why it shouldn't even matter and "transvestigations" are bullshit.

But his normal schtick is media criticism, covering franchises like Star Wars, Halo, and Assassin's Creed. They're just genuinely good reviews that aren't afraid to get into the politics where appropriate (including explicitly rejecting some of the more popular bigoted takes) but honestly feel it's about the way that particular lens affects the media, rather than being an end into itself.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 1 day ago

At least where I live that's a big if. Nuclear in Australia is most often used by fossil fuel interests as a stalling tactic because of how long it would take to get up and running and how expensive it would be, compared to renewables.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 37 points 2 days ago

I understand the impulse to be empathetic and kind. But it's very hard to respond in good faith to someone who just made a post where more than half the words are "fuck you".

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 41 points 2 days ago

No, that brings painful war flashbacks.

15
40
26
8
7
51
submitted 1 month ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/gaming@lemmy.zip
24
75
143
submitted 1 month ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/games@lemmy.world
27
14

The rules state:

If you find a scroll, you can try to figure out what spell it contains. If the spell is a common spell from your spell list or a spell you know, you can spend a single Recall Knowledge action and automatically succeed at identifying the scroll’s spell. If it’s not, you must use Identify Magic (page 238) to learn what spell the scroll holds.

And Identify Magic says:

Once you discover that an item, location, or ongoing effect is magical, you can spend 10 minutes to try to identify the particulars of its magic. If your attempt is interrupted, you must start over. The GM sets the DC for your check. Cursed magic or esoteric subjects usually have higher DCs or might even be impossible to identify using this activity alone. Heightening a spell doesn't increase the DC to identify it.

Critical Success You learn all the attributes of the magic, including its name (for an effect), what it does, any means of activating it (for an item or location), and whether it is cursed.
Success For an item or location, you get a sense of what it does and learn any means of activating it. For an ongoing effect (such as a spell with a duration), you learn the effect's name and what it does. You can't try again in hopes of getting a critical success.
Failure You fail to identify the magic and can't try again for 1 day.
Critical Failure You misidentify the magic as something else of the GM's choice.

It makes sense to me that the DC should be the spell rank DC. What's not clear to me is how, if at all, a success vs critical success should be played. On a non-critical success, would they get a sense of the type of effect of the magic, but not know the specific spell?

view more: next ›

Zagorath

joined 1 year ago