590
SMBC [2012-02-02] (www.smbc-comics.com)

Bonus panel:

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 110 points 4 months ago

A bit sad that this is still relevant 12 years later.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 4 months ago

Those supposedly outrageous counter examples are much less unheard of though.

[-] leverage@lemdro.id 2 points 4 months ago

Because those are beaches of the 4th amendment, so of course you don't see that happen very often. That's the point being made.

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The person you're replying to is saying that those breaches of the 4th amendment are less absurd now than they were at the time the comic was written

[-] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 4 months ago

much less unheard of

Don’t fail to not use double negatives!

No wonder the responder didn’t unsuccessfully misunderstand the sentence.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

The only reason the physical stuff doesn’t happen is because it’s a logistical nightmare to perform it, but no one would bat an eye lash at the ethics of it. Simply, they would if they could 🤷‍♀️

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
590 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12655 readers
1899 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS