My theory is that the flagship needs to be thiner and lighter than the "cheaper" models, thus reducing its battery capacity.
It's sort of an open secret for years now. But I'm not totally convinced that it will work well.
I have a Chromebook with a Ryzen APU (Ryzen 3250 or smth). And while it handles all web tasks really well, it completely struggles with Android Apps. Even apps like "YouTube Kids" or "Prime Video" run far worse than their web couterparts.
And I'm not even talking about gaming - even old games like "cut the rope" run at unplayable framerates.
(my guess is that the whole virtualization framework is holding these apps back.)
Good news is that Pixel phones prices drop fast. For example, the price of Pixel 9 dropped from 900€ to 550€ in less than one year.
The "conservative party" is the CDU/CSU, and even though they won, they just had their second worst result since the 1950s.
If it's a civil and interesting discussion, why not?
The worst are apps that send ads through notifications.
Oh I had the same thought. Whoever limits password length probably has many other shitty security practices.
The site provides a nice TL,DR:
- Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
- The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
- Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
Whenever YouTube changes something, newpipe adapts to it within one or two days. Thanks to the devs!
Wikipedia page.