Yes.
I absolutely love semver, but it can lead to absurdly high version numbers (a package that I maintain at work is now at something like 3.1.125). It contains mostly config for other things, so... This is somewhat expected.
I still think it's better than just naming every version after the year of its release (like 2026.1) or random arbitrary numbers, though




I mean "absurdly high" in the context of the thread where Linus says at about 20 it's time for a new version.
But in the sense of semver, that's a completely reasonable version number, assuming you had many small fixes/additions.