[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Tbf it's a comedy show, it being informative is mostly an accident. This one is rare for being factual and not about why we should nuke the moon or which cartoon characters are invited to the cookout or something like that.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

"Just got to this" doesn't really seem like a lie to me. If they said "just read this", that would be a lie, but "just got to this" implies they didn't have time to reply/think about it, without commenting on whether they read it. Honestly to me "just got to this" implies it's been on their to-do list but they didn't get around to it until now. If they hadn't read it at all saying "just got this" or "just read this" would make more sense.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 2 months ago

Even from a viewer perspective, this sounds depressing to watch. I don't really get what people get out of this.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 year ago

Little known fact about D&D succubi: since 4e succubi can change sexes freely. Incubi and succubi are just different forms of the same monster.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As far as I'm aware, there's nothing preventing a PluralKit equivalent from being made for other platforms. In fact, a quick search turned up a WIP Matrix port on github.

So no, I don't think this is true. Lack of PluralKit isn't what's preventing people from switching en masse. It's the opposite—lack of people switching means there's a lack of demand for a PluralKit port in the first place, so even though there is a port people don't know it exists and thus it doesn't get as much dev attention.

It comes down to network effects, ultimately, and just plain inertia. If you're already on Discord, and all your friends are on Discord, it's hard to convince you to switch. And being more familiar with the Discord bot ecosystem (like PluralKit) is just one more thing that adds to the inertia.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 340 points 1 year ago

So this is just a thing now? Removing media from the world?

They found out it works so now it's gonna become a trend.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ending prices with 99 is manipulative. We accept it from businesses because we're conditioned to, they're businesses after all! Being manipulated by businesses is just how our current society operates, part of the environment we live in. But if an individual offers us something for a price ending in 99, we're much more likely to be suspicious of it.

The article actually explicitly mentions this, and suggests you list things for 25 under instead of 1 under, for example, as it won't immediately trigger recognition that you're doing this.

All the better to psychologically manipulate our fellow people in pursuit of profit, my dear.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 2 years ago

It's kind of ironic taking a project that's already written in Rust and writing a replacement for it in Java.

Usually things get ported to Rust, not the other way around.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 2 years ago

The annoying thing about that is that if you don't long rest enough in BG3, you miss a lot of story beats. Unlike tabletop, it wants you to long rest, and will punish you for not long resting rather than punishing you for long resting.

I'm doing a second playthrough and I'm realizing just how much I missed during my first playthrough where I used my tabletop mindset of "rest only when absolutely necessary". And even then sometimes watching other people's playthroughs I see scenes I never saw.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 2 years ago

This is a weird one because despite being a "good" spell, it entails the mass murder of innocent neutrals. It really doesn't seem like a good action to me.

It seems like anyone who was okay with this would fall to neutral or evil simply by virtue of being okay with mass murder, and in turn fall victim to the Great Neutral Purge.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No. It fits Captain Angel's perspective as an edgy pirate pining after their lover, but Starfleet is full of hopeful, enthusiastic scientists who are in space because they want to be. They love exploration for exploration's sake, and are on a ship full of people who likely have similar interests.

Angel's perspective is warped by their passion; I mean, they're literally in the middle of hijacking a Starfleet ship to get their lover back. They think their dependency on love is universal, when in reality most people are more emotionally stable than them. Although it probably helps when you're in Starfleet and have an incredibly supportive working environment and not, you know, a pirate crew.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 years ago

I worry that the cat is out of the bag on this. The tech for this stuff is out there, and you can run it on your home computer, so barring some sort of massive governmental overreach I don't see a way to stop it.

They can't even stop piracy and there's the full weight of the US copyright industry behind it. How are they going to stop this tech?

view more: next ›

melmi

joined 2 years ago