Fun fact: Steel rails on the moon aren't the best idea. Instead, roads made of sintered regolith + trains with ceramic wheels are cheaper to build and have the same efficiency that steel wheels+ steel rails have.
People smh. Who drinks bean juice and throws the beans away? You really are allergic to FIBER, aren't you???
Real men don't throw away the healthy coffee beans. We EAT THEM LIKE WE'RE SUPPOSED TO. It cures cancer.
/s
The AI ministry is a necessity imo. Lemmy often gets caught up in shitting on OpenAI and other AI stuff (which is generally justified imo).
However, the potential of this tech to become a nightmare if not implemented correctly is huge. The worst case (depends how you look at it) scenario of this tech is mass unemployment.
In other words, good or bad, AI has the potential to massively change how the economy works, and thus change how our lives look like. If this does indeed happen, and we are not prepared to handle the worst case scenario, then that would be bad.
Let's assume that heating water to 500C does what you want it to do. Even then, the sheer amount of energy required to do this would be massive. It would just be incredibly uneconomical to do this, when other cheaper solutions (like not polluting in the first place) exist.
I think disabling downvotes totally for the user's content by default would be a bad idea, because it is important for a user to know if what they are saying is unpopular.
Here's an approach I have taken for my app (for all posts and comments).
Remember, the reasoning for this is a mere hypothesis and not results obtained from an experiment.
The 5 percent rule aims to prevent fringe opinions from downvoting. This solves issues like, "why do I have 3 downvotes on a picture of my cute puppy?".
The 5 downvotes rule prevents downvoting bias. I have observed this happening on Reddit a lot. If a comment has 3 upvotes and 2 downvotes, people tend to downvote more (just because of the downvote counts and not the content itself). 2 downvotes in a 5 total votes sample size is too small to make any decision about the quality of content.
In my opinion, cases like these are where the downvotes serve more as a mental health destroyer rather than decentralised content moderation.
So to answer your question, I think having the current as default would be better, I.e., option "Show". However, if you're open to refine this even further, I would suggest the 5-5% idea.
I agree a little with the post tbh. So I generally hold pro AI views (where I admire the tech, believe it can make the future a lot better, while being against it being owned by oligarchs and for profit corpos).
When I started using Lemmy in 2023, everybody here was ABSOLUTELY AGAINST AI. Any post/comment mentioning AI in a slightly positive tone was downvoted to oblivion.
It was really depressing to see stuff like this, because the concept of downvoting on Lemmy and irl works very differently I suppose. No one irl just randomly shows up, shows you a thumbs down and leaves, right? Most conversations like these offline tend to be a lot more developed than a "thumbs down". In my experience, people offline are also a lot less meaner compared to online, as they are talking to a real human being rather than a profile picture.
I suppose this platform makes you a little thick skinned too. Sometimes you have to say, "I am right, even if this large group of people thinks I am wrong" and accept that sometimes the majority does not share your opinion, no matter how correct you think it is.
Now about disabling downvotes for your own post- I'm not sure if that's a good idea. Doing so prevents getting feedback from others. There are times where I have been a dick (mostly unintentionally). The amount of downvotes told me that what I said was wrong, and I needed to do better. If downvotes were disabled, then I wouldn't have access to this feedback.
Fuck your ex BF. What a pos human being ugh.
Ur pfp looks like a dick pic
Mars is so incredibly useless from the point of view of advancing civilization.
We can do so much stuff on the moon a lot better than on Mars. In short, the moon is MEANT to be industrialised by us.
Here's a video, cuz I'm too lazy to type out everything. Also, sorry for the YouTube link. I don't think this fellow uploads anywhere else.
Also don't get me wrong. Mars is really cool as a scientific curiosity. It's just not suitable for advancing civilization yet.
This is art, isn't it? I'm feeling so many emotions for this "old gaming rig" or whatever. Poor fella... :(. Hope they (the rig) survive a lot longer...
I love how no one here likes sucking off the Royal family.