Tab groups are built for open tabs, bookmarks are built for revisiting things. Their use cases are quite different in my opinion.
I assume we're in a similar boat so let me assure you: no, you won't - because we wouldn't even realize it happened.
Only after s few months one of us will recall this thread and be like "oh, yeah. Twitter. Seems really dead finally. Good."
And to be clear I expect they person to be you because my memory is awful.
Because so far you've got downvotes but no reply:
This group of people wants many of my friends dead. They want me dead most likely.
This is the trolley problem without a problem, each active Nazi on this planet harms a whole lot of people.
If you're honestly interested in why this is not as black and white as you paint it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
I see the picture as a propaganda piece on a life threatening conflict.
That small red bulb counteracts the entropy argument because you bring energy (and quite a lot of I recall) into the system.
Would be a sad day if we no longer could reduce entropy locally under the invest of energy.
The"single cell pet" gets me even more... Like isn't that a tad specific? Dogs? No prob! Rabbits? Be my guest. Amoeba? Fuck off, weirdo!
Hypothesis: the message seems to imply that the cliche nature lover needs to trample and destroy said nature to be close to it.
This seems the most likely explanation to me.
And I find it neither funny nor insightful.
Edit: I can't manage to copy paste usernames on mobile but please check out the refinement by the comment to this post. Highly valuable edition. Tldr of it: not "nature lovers" in general but social media invasive nature lovers.
On the one hand ... “Never make fun of someone if they mispronounce a word. It means they learned it by reading.”
On the other hand.. what else are friends there for?
I strongly disagree. The burden of proof lies with the one making the claim and this bot has zero transparency regarding its benchmark, database or other criteria. That combined with the fact that it's usage (apparently exclusively) seems to be highly pushed is enough to stay sceptical.
Personally I just blocked it but I have full understanding for anyone downvoting it, simply to communicate "I disagree with the existence of this bot in this context"
As your perception sounds quite negative I'll try to change your view!
Instead of looking down on people fanatifally following a "celebrity", take pity on them:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasocial_interaction
In short: their brain chemistry tricks them into thinking that they are following a friend and have the emotional reactions and interests as we'd hope our real friends do.
I find it really sad to be honest.
I'd like to invite you to watch V for vendetta. A good actor can do magic even behind a mask!
Edit: I'm not sure how Downey Jr would perform, just want to point out that a mask alone is not a blocker for a great performance.
The first link goes into amazing detail on that. In short: all your information concerning location as well as current IP and some other metadata gets send to a basically unknown company with no transparency on how that data is handled.
I highly recommend reading the first, linked post though!
"you will be employed as an independent contractor"
Dear (US) companies: this is not "employed". This is commissioned or mandated, depending on the contract details.