I simply dont believe the people you're describing exist - at least, not as you've chosen to describe them
If you were describing a werewolf, it wouldnt be a defense of their cannibalism to say they aren't real.
I simply dont believe the people you're describing exist - at least, not as you've chosen to describe them
If you were describing a werewolf, it wouldnt be a defense of their cannibalism to say they aren't real.
Literally marching with a communist flag
Lmao, thats actually amazing - which communist flag??
Read the room, kid. I'm an anarchist, but I dont run around pretending not to understand the ML perspective just because it's easier than treating it as coherent.
There isn't anything there to be offended by, it's just a lazy and ill-considered application of a political label
It honestly just seems like you dont really know what the politics are, you just know 'tankie' as a loosely pejorative term for someone you have strong disagreements with.
Idk what to tell you bud, boldly declaring that a political label specific to socialist infighting has nothing to do with socialism doesnt somehow make it true.
I don't see modern tankies caring about socialism
You're not talking about tankies then.
What version of 'tankie' is the one that would praise the US for literally anything trump does?
Like if there's one thing I thought I knew about tankies, it was that they fucking loathe the US and Trump
What.
Calling for the dissolution of Israel, or calling for a one-state solution without specifying equal rights for all people; Jewish in particular
This part floored me. As if it wasnt Israel that was currently denying equal rights to Palestinians and not the other way around... this is just the zionist version of 'all lives matter' bullshit.
WHY IS THIS MAN STILL IN OFFICE
Between this and the other story earlier this week, its crystal fucking clear that he is not well. Does nobody close to him care about his clear brain damage from his stroke? It's like the entire federal government is weekend at bernie's and the whole thing is being run by staffers
You don't understand, their support of lesser fascism is necessary to avoid the greater fascism, so by opposing them you're actually supporting the greater fascism
Does anyone know what the ethical objections acrually were here?
I would have thought they would have specifically called out data falsification if that were the problem that resulted in the paper being pulled - otherwise it leaves the door open to misinterpretation