262
rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 7 months ago by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 7 months ago

If nobody has guns nobody needs guns, pretty simple

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 164 points 8 months ago

normal size car problems*

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 9 months ago

Wondering if I can turn that off somehow

have you heard of our lord and savior linux

127

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/11497758

This coffee shop uses AI to measure the productivity of their employees and the time spent in the shop per customer. Welcome to capitalist innovation.

513
: ( (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 10 months ago by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
81
wateruleon (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 10 months ago by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
189
submitted 10 months ago by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
550
submitted 10 months ago by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 126 points 10 months ago

"bug" aka purposely making firefox unusable on one of the largest websites in the world so more people use chromium

(these allegations are based solely on prejudice against google and its subsidiaries, and do not necessarily hold true in reality)

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 10 months ago

If you need to block your local instance admin then you probably shouldn't be using that instance...

38

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/technology@lemmy.world/t/673723

Researchers in the UK claim to have translated the sound of laptop keystrokes into their corresponding letters with 95 percent accuracy in some cases.

That 95 percent figure was achieved with nothing but a nearby iPhone. Remote methods are just as dangerous: over Zoom, the accuracy of recorded keystrokes only dropped to 93 percent, while Skype calls were still 91.7 percent accurate.

In other words, this is a side channel attack with considerable accuracy, minimal technical requirements, and a ubiquitous data exfiltration point: Microphones, which are everywhere from our laptops, to our wrists, to the very rooms we work in.

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 1 year ago

alternatively we could get rid of car dependency

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 year ago

classic "protecting the children" to do something terrible excuse

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 1 year ago

Just use uBlock Origin.

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 1 year ago

Because people in this community already know not to use Google Chrome and Microsoft.

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 1 year ago

For the comments, can anyone give me an actual reason to use Brave over Firefox (and it's forks)? I guess the cryptocurrency aspect is a reason, but I wouldn't say it's a very good one.

1588
Please, do not use Brave. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

Edit: Please be aware that the spyware article on Brave (and the rest of the browsers on the site) is outdated and may not reflect the browser as it is today.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL's. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I'd say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

Edit: To the people commenting saying how Brave has a good out-of-the-box experience compared to other browsers, yes, it does. However, this is not a warning for your average person, this is a warning for people who actively care about their privacy and don't mind configuring their browser to maximize said privacy.

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Brave is an ad company. Use a privacy-centric browser like hardened firefox, librewolf, or ungoogled chromium.

Edit: added a comma

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 202 points 1 year ago

You really just shouldn't use brave..

view more: next ›

eya

joined 1 year ago