Wow that's a nifty relic! I remember when Mozilla stood for things!

Now imagine it's not a magic box. Imagine it is a computer program, written with intent, that was intentionally fed copyrighted material so it could make those things people asked for.

Giant companies operating outside the law at "the cost of doing business" built plagiarism machines off the life's work of thousands of people so that horny weirdos could jerk it to Pikachu with tits.

Oh don't worry you'll get to experience one firsthand in [ checks watch ] about 20 minutes.

"Let's have the chatroom be the knowledgebase!" Fucking brilliant, no notes.

Counterpoint: If you think you said something stupid, you're entitled to delete it. Don't feel obligated to hang your ass out there and take a beating for a cold take.

Direct link to the PDF.

We will continue to use Bugzilla, moz-phab, Phabricator, and Lando.

Although we'll be hosting the repository on GitHub, our contribution workflow will remain unchanged and we will not be accepting Pull Requests at this time.

The cool thing about distributed version control is that it's distributed. It sounds like GitHub will just be a public remote, rather than the place where active development happens.

I mean, turning on Penis sounds pretty low-effort to me.

Ingress and egress costs are real and those assholes attached images to their spam. Hundreds of posts coming in at 700kb a pop does damage if you're relying on a cloud provider to store your shit. Then, it gets accessed by all your users.

Billing alarms go bing bing bing.

Preface: I appreciate the sentiment, fuck Microsoft.

1. Projects typically aren't "hosted" on code repositories like GitHub.
2. Because the underlying version control technology, git, is meant to be distributed - it's super weird to draw that line in the sand. It's like saying "show me TXT files written with SublimeText, I hate Notepad++!"
3. I get that you might want to, like, judge a developer for using github? But, like... features are features. Build minutes are build minutes. If you fork a repo and use GitLab to manage it, does that make the project better?

They understand that git is a Distributed Version Control System, right?