1
14
submitted 7 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
2
7
submitted 7 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
3
16
submitted 19 hours ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/economics@lemmy.ml
4
6
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
5
6
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
6
3
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
7
4
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
8
4
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
9
18
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
10
3
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
11
8
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml

Trump's 34% tariff gambit against China is the latest convulsion of a capitalist system in decay. For four decades, neoliberal orthodoxy gutted the US industrial base, outsourcing production to low-wage markets to maximize shareholder profits. The result is a financialized economy where Wall Street thrives while the real economy lies in ruins. Tariffs, sold as economic populism, are a naive attempt to reindustrialize the economy. However, this policy cannot work without massive public investment in factories, worker training, or supply chain sovereignty. All the tariffs can accomplish is to inflate consumer prices while enriching the same oligarchs who lobbied for outsourcing. The US now finds itself in a middle of a massive contradiction: protectionism requires a productive base, yet capitalists long ago abandoned production for speculation.

The US corporate aristocracy, living off cheap overseas labor and deregulated profit extraction, rejects the long-term industrial policy needed to revive manufacturing. Why? Because reinvesting in domestic production would require taxing capital, regulating markets, and empowering labor. All such policies would be anathema to the billionaire class. Meanwhile, the working majority, promised a renaissance of industrial dignity, will only see higher prices and stagnant wages. What we're really seeing here is class struggle masked as trade policy.

China's calculated response of export controls on key rare earth along with the reciprocal 34% tariffs reveals a strategic depth absent in the US. China is able to seamlessly coordinate industrial policy, resource control, and geopolitical aims. China made massive investments into making itself an essential global producer of rare earths which are vital for semiconductors, weapons, and green tech. Now, China is able to weaponize the very supply chains that western capitalism outsourced. Where the US sees trade as a ledger of deficits, China sees it as a battlefield of material dependencies.

The most likely outcome of the tariff war will be further erosion of dollar hegemony. The US pushes nations to look for alternatives by weaponizing the dollar and extracting seigniorage. At the same time, China's BRICS+ alliances and Belt and Road infrastructure offer a pragmatic path forward for countries that wish to retain their sovereignty.

The trade war is a symptom of capitalism's systemic crisis. As the multipolar world emerges, western workers will bear the brunt of new economic realities unless they are able to seize the means of production. The tariffs are mere tremors, the earthquake will come when labor finally rejects the logic of capital altogether.

12
6
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
13
16
14
14
submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
15
2
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
16
14
submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
17
5
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
18
-3

The plan can be summarized in three points:

  1. Disorient the world economic order with tariffs.

  2. Drop tariffs for friendly countries willing to peg their currency to the dollar and abide by certain economic and military rules.

  3. Charge said countries a regular "user fee" for membership inside this new order.

Europe having their own currency and being adverse to cooperation with the US in terms of this new world order is why Trump is friendlier to Russia and why he is less friendly to Ukraine. Ukraine belongs outside this new order unless they make a "deal" with the US. I would be interested to see if Russia would be willing to peg their currency and pay a membership fee. Probably not.

19
2
submitted 3 days ago by humanspiral@lemmy.ca to c/economics@lemmy.ml
20
13
submitted 5 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
21
6
submitted 1 week ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml

Steve’s guest is noted economist L. Randall Wray, one of the early developers of modern money theory. As many times as this podcast has talked about MMT, it’s always topical. In fact, just last week, Elon Musk discovered 14 magic money computers in government agencies!

So, Trump had to hire the richest man in the world who hired who knows how many hundreds of young tech kids to discover what we’ve been saying for 30 years, which is that Congress appropriates money, and then the computers keystroke it into people’s accounts.

There’s no mystery about this at all, but they think they’ve discovered not only something that people didn’t know, but something that’s, oh, it’s so scary. It’s nefarious that the government uses computers to increase the size of people’s accounts. Well, that’s spending. That’s the way it’s done.

Clearly, this is a good time to revisit the valuable insights of MMT and look at the implications for building a society that serves its people.

This episode dives deep into the fundamentals, debunking misconceptions about government spending, the role of taxes, and the myth that the US government can run out of money, like a household.

Randy and Steve talk about changes in the economy due to financialization, and the difference between budget constraints and inflation constraints. Randy explains why we need to look at the history of debt in order to understand money. He talks about banking, including transactions between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury.

The conversation breaks down complex concepts into relatable terms, sometimes with a touch of humor.

22
10
submitted 1 week ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
23
9
24
6
submitted 1 week ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml

Bullets:

  • Western media outlets, Wall Street, and Silicon Valley are belatedly coming to the same conclusion: years of falling asset prices and cost of living has made China the most competitive economy in the world.

  • Our top government officials, industry leaders, and columnists were predicting a collapse in China, because they completely misunderstood the long-term policy implications of falling costs across a modern economy.

  • China was the only major economy to see long-term deflation in recent years, and the costs of housing, commercial rent, food, electricity, travel, and education were pushed lower because of soaring industrial productivity and efficiency gains.

  • Now China is reaping the benefits of building a ruthlessly cost-competitive economy that dominates in most areas of manufacturing, raw materials sourcing, high technology, logistics, education, and health.

25
3
submitted 1 week ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/economics@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

Economics

1957 readers
42 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS