[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Flatpak version is not v3 optimized, I think.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

It is 🙂

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

And, yet he got prosecuted for Charter_08 ? That's self-contradicting, don't you think? 🙂

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

So, demand for democratic election should land anyone in jail, right?

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I assume you understand the difference between political prisoners and normal prisoners, right? Unless those numbers represents political prisoners, I fail to see the point you made.

Imagine having a Government that uses political prisoners as forced laborers.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Those who are using Zen, can you confirm if the Zen perform better (in terms of performance) than vanilla Firefox?

33
28
9
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Wrap-up

This release is most importantly here to fix to the annoying "Youtube API returned error 400" error that prevented all channel pages from loading.

If you're updating from the previous release, it provides no improvements on the ability to play videos. If updating from a commit in-between release, it removes the "Please sign in" error caused by a previous attempt at restoring video playback on large instances.

36
124
295

Unfortunately, due to the complexity and specialized nature of AVX-512, such optimizations are typically reserved for performance-critical applications and require expertise in low-level programming and processor microarchitecture.

257
submitted 3 weeks ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
57
submitted 4 weeks ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
313
239
submitted 4 weeks ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

79
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
325
[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 53 points 8 months ago

Bad news is that it is not clear at this point whether Mozilla is going to go forward with the implementation. A post on Reddit by one of the project members suggests that the build is a "rough proof-of-concept". Some features tested in the build "did not survive". It is unclear which did not, as they are not mentioned. Mozilla is, however, implementing those that survived the cut into Firefox. Again, the poster does not mention which those are. It is also not verified that the poster is actually a member of the project team, so take this with a grain of salt as well.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 122 points 8 months ago
  • Careful choice of program to infect the whole Linux ecosystem
  • Time it took to gain trust
  • Level of sophistication in introducing backdoor in open source product

All of these are signs of persistent threat actors aka State sponsor hacker. Though the real motive we would never know as it's now a failed project.

view more: next ›

KarnaSubarna

joined 1 year ago