23

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40459734

[...]

In the past few years, China has been ramping up its construction of coal plants, partially eschewing climate targets for greater domestic energy production. China’s coal construction totaled an output of 94.5 GW in 2024, the highest number in 10 years, the equivalent of approximately 90 nuclear reactors.

[...]

China is turning the clock backwards on its market-driven reforms; the country’s coal boom isn’t reflecting market pressures, but rather Beijing’s top-down campaign for energy security. With the surge in coal plant construction, operational inefficiencies are undermining the industry’s sustainability. China’s average coal plant operating hours have fallen to 4,628 hours a year, or about 53% of a year. This means the average Chinese plant sits idle for nearly half the year, signaling severe underutilization.

[...]

To counter [...] market challenges, Beijing is artificially boosting demand. The National Development and Reform Commission of China, the country’s economic planner, asked domestic buyers to focus on purchasing from the northern regions to offset the excess supply there. It also directed a 10% increase in thermal coal reserves, stockpiles used for heating and electricity, continuing the trend of inflating demand.

[...]

The proliferation of coal and cheap domestic energy, no matter how inefficient, has another impact: increasing Chinese exports. With sometimes literally free energy, producers of green tech products in China, such as EVs and Solar Panels, have no choice but to look overseas. This embraces the core competencies of the traditional method of Chinese growth since 1979, export-led development, while simultaneously serving China’s foreign policy objectives by burnishing its image as a green energy superpower providing renewable tech to the world.

[...]

11
submitted 10 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/china@sopuli.xyz

[...]

In the past few years, China has been ramping up its construction of coal plants, partially eschewing climate targets for greater domestic energy production. China’s coal construction totaled an output of 94.5 GW in 2024, the highest number in 10 years, the equivalent of approximately 90 nuclear reactors.

[...]

China is turning the clock backwards on its market-driven reforms; the country’s coal boom isn’t reflecting market pressures, but rather Beijing’s top-down campaign for energy security. With the surge in coal plant construction, operational inefficiencies are undermining the industry’s sustainability. China’s average coal plant operating hours have fallen to 4,628 hours a year, or about 53% of a year. This means the average Chinese plant sits idle for nearly half the year, signaling severe underutilization.

[...]

To counter [...] market challenges, Beijing is artificially boosting demand. The National Development and Reform Commission of China, the country’s economic planner, asked domestic buyers to focus on purchasing from the northern regions to offset the excess supply there. It also directed a 10% increase in thermal coal reserves, stockpiles used for heating and electricity, continuing the trend of inflating demand.

[...]

The proliferation of coal and cheap domestic energy, no matter how inefficient, has another impact: increasing Chinese exports. With sometimes literally free energy, producers of green tech products in China, such as EVs and Solar Panels, have no choice but to look overseas. This embraces the core competencies of the traditional method of Chinese growth since 1979, export-led development, while simultaneously serving China’s foreign policy objectives by burnishing its image as a green energy superpower providing renewable tech to the world.

[...]

6
submitted 12 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/china@sopuli.xyz
  • Chinese exporters cut wage costs to stay competitive
  • Underemployment is hidden deflationary force, analysts say
  • Temporary jobs pay less than last year as tariffs bite
7

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40434523

  • Podul weakened from a typhoon after injuring 143 people in Taiwan
  • Hong Kong media tycoon, pro-democracy advocate Jimmy Lai's trial cancelled
  • Extreme rains pose threat to China's economic growth, says analyst
2
submitted 18 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/china@sopuli.xyz
  • Podul weakened from a typhoon after injuring 143 people in Taiwan
  • Hong Kong media tycoon, pro-democracy advocate Jimmy Lai's trial cancelled
  • Extreme rains pose threat to China's economic growth, says analyst
19

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40434365

This summer, much of North China has endured widespread temperatures above 35°C. Even typically cooler, high-latitude summer retreats like Harbin in Northeast China—usually a refuge from the heat—saw temperatures soar past 35°C in late June and July. As climate change accelerates, extreme heat events will become increasingly frequent.

Just two years earlier, in late June 2023, North China sweltered under a searing three-day heat wave that arrived weeks earlier than usual and broke six decades' worth of temperature records. Daily highs soared past 40°C in some areas, triggering heat-related illnesses, straining the region's power grid, and threatening crops during the growing season. For millions living in this vital agricultural and industrial heartland, the scorching conditions were a stark reminder of the mounting risks posed by climate extremes.

A study published in Earth's Future by researchers Kexin Gui and Tianjun Zhou of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, has pointed out the dual drivers behind this unprecedented heat: large-scale atmospheric circulation and an unusually strong soil moisture feedback.

[...]

The study warns that such conditions may become more common under climate change. Model projections suggest that heat waves with the same intensity as the 2023 event could become the new normal by the end of the century. While the influence of soil moisture feedback on extreme heat may weaken in the long term due to projected increases in soil moisture.

[...]

The findings underscore the urgency of climate adaptation strategies in North China, where the increasing heat extremes pose a significant threat to livelihoods and ecosystems.

2
submitted 18 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/china@sopuli.xyz

This summer, much of North China has endured widespread temperatures above 35°C. Even typically cooler, high-latitude summer retreats like Harbin in Northeast China—usually a refuge from the heat—saw temperatures soar past 35°C in late June and July. As climate change accelerates, extreme heat events will become increasingly frequent.

Just two years earlier, in late June 2023, North China sweltered under a searing three-day heat wave that arrived weeks earlier than usual and broke six decades' worth of temperature records. Daily highs soared past 40°C in some areas, triggering heat-related illnesses, straining the region's power grid, and threatening crops during the growing season. For millions living in this vital agricultural and industrial heartland, the scorching conditions were a stark reminder of the mounting risks posed by climate extremes.

A study published in Earth's Future by researchers Kexin Gui and Tianjun Zhou of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, has pointed out the dual drivers behind this unprecedented heat: large-scale atmospheric circulation and an unusually strong soil moisture feedback.

[...]

The study warns that such conditions may become more common under climate change. Model projections suggest that heat waves with the same intensity as the 2023 event could become the new normal by the end of the century. While the influence of soil moisture feedback on extreme heat may weaken in the long term due to projected increases in soil moisture.

[...]

The findings underscore the urgency of climate adaptation strategies in North China, where the increasing heat extremes pose a significant threat to livelihoods and ecosystems.

3
submitted 19 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/china@sopuli.xyz

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40431544

Op-ed by Tom Harper, Lecturer in International Relations, University of East London, UK.

[...]

This potential to control downstream water supply to another country has been demonstrated by the effects that earlier dam projects in the region have had on the nations of the Mekong river delta in 2019. As a result, this gives Beijing a significant degree of leverage over its neighbours.

One country restricting water supply to put pressure on another is by no means unprecedented. In fact in April 2025, following a terror attack by Pakistan-based The Resistance Front in Kashmir, which killed 26 people (mainly tourists), India suspended the Indus waters treaty, restricting water supplies to Pakistani farmers in the region. So the potential for China’s dam to disrupt water flows will further compound the already tense geopolitics of southern Asia.

[...]

12
submitted 19 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/world@quokk.au

Op-ed by Tom Harper, Lecturer in International Relations, University of East London, UK.

[...]

This potential to control downstream water supply to another country has been demonstrated by the effects that earlier dam projects in the region have had on the nations of the Mekong river delta in 2019. As a result, this gives Beijing a significant degree of leverage over its neighbours.

One country restricting water supply to put pressure on another is by no means unprecedented. In fact in April 2025, following a terror attack by Pakistan-based The Resistance Front in Kashmir, which killed 26 people (mainly tourists), India suspended the Indus waters treaty, restricting water supplies to Pakistani farmers in the region. So the potential for China’s dam to disrupt water flows will further compound the already tense geopolitics of southern Asia.

[...]

15

Op-ed by Ihsan Yilmaz, Research Professor of Political Science and International Relations, Deakin University - Ana-Maria Bliuc, Associate Professor in Social Psychology, University of Dundee - John Betts, Senior Lecturer, Monash University - Nicholas Morieson, Research fellow, Deakin University.

Last week, Australian authorities arrested a woman for foreign interference. The Chinese citizen and Canberra resident is just the third person ever charged under our foreign interference laws.

According to the Australian Federal Police, she was allegedly gathering information on, and may be involved in efforts to infiltrate, the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association. The group is banned in China.

[...]

The story might seem unimportant. After all, it doesn’t involve defence secrets or political leaders, but a small, relatively obscure community.

But this is exactly why it matters. The case shows the Chinese Communist Party is deeply interested in Australia’s Chinese diaspora communities. It’s willing to disregard Australian law to police and manipulate them in ways that serve Beijing’s interests.

It also shows how authoritarian regimes use “sharp power”, or covert, manipulative influence, to do more than just spy. They also surveil, intimidate and control communities far beyond their borders.

[...]

Sharp power is different [from soft power and hard power in that] it manipulates and distorts the information people receive, quietly shaping how they see the world and the choices they think they have. It’s the use of covert, manipulative and often emotional tactics to shape how other countries think, decide and act, often without them realising it’s happening.

[...]

When China’s state news agency, Xinhua, operates openly in other countries, it is playing the soft power game. But when China Radio International secretly funds 33 radio stations in 14 countries, or when Turkey spreads anti-Western conspiracy theories and disinformation, it crosses into sharp power.

[...]

Sharp power in Australia

The Canberra spy case shows how Beijing can shape opinions by infiltrating local Chinese organisations. It can also control information and mobilise people in ways that serve its own political interests. It reveals how some authoritarian governments regard co-ethnic, co-religious, or culturally linked diasporas in the West as part of their national community and seek to influence them accordingly.

Australia’s universities have also been targets of China’s sharp power. Scholars critical of Beijing’s oppression of Tibetans, Uighur Muslims, and pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong have faced pressure from student groups aligned with Chinese state interests.

The Chinese language media in Australia has also become deeply influenced by Beijing’s narratives. Many once independent outlets now republish state controlled content, narrowing the diversity of views available to Chinese-speaking Australians. This also encourages them to remain loyal and connected to China.

[...]

For a multicultural society such as Australia, the challenge is to respond firmly to authoritarian sharp power attacks without undermining the openness and diversity that are among our greatest democratic strengths.

[...]

10
submitted 21 hours ago by Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org to c/world@quokk.au

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40426531

The technological and strategic brilliance of the country's world-class companies are being swamped by macroeconomic troubles.

Op-ed by George Magnus, research associate at Oxford University’s China Centre and at Soas University of London, UK.

[...]

Common concerns about coercive politics and human rights aside, some notions of China as an unstoppable economic, technological and military behemoth sit alongside others focused more on an increasingly sclerotic, over- centralised political economy, that depends on wasteful economic stimulus, and features poor governance and institutions. The fusion of these notions suggests that we may already have reached “peak China”.

[...]

At the Central Economic Work Conference in December last year, China’s premier, Li Qiang, summarised his country’s condition by saying candidly that the foundation for sustained economic recovery and growth was not strong, demand was weak, and there were pressures on job creation and “fiscal difficulties” among several local governments.

Although consumption has been made a top priority, actual policy measures to make it so have been underwhelming, partly because redistributing economic power to companies and citizens also entails changes in political power, which are anathema to the Communist party.

[...]

The super-globalisation from which China benefited is pretty much over, and the world’s biggest export nation is now confronted by a fragmenting and fracturing trade and investment environment in which commerce within blocs is holding up better than trade between them.

China’s bloc includes a majority of the world’s population, but very small proportions of world GDP, investment and wealth. At the same time, developed and middle-income economies, as well as emerging nations, are pushing back against what they perceive to be predatory trade policies by a mercantilist China.

[...]

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

The new German targets are very bad. What's really disturbing is that Germany's new government is following a global trend with this policy.

In 2024, global gas demand rebounded by 2.8%, spurred by China, Russia and the USA

Gas consumption also grew in Canada, in Asia (especially in India, Indonesia, South Korea, and Taiwan), in the Middle East (especially in Iran and Saudi Arabia), and in Africa (especially in Nigeria, Algeria and Egypt). On the contrary, rising carbon-free power generation reduced gas consumption in Japan (-3%) and Australia (-4%), while lower LNG exports reduced gas consumption in liquefaction plants in Qatar.

A new report reveals that a surge in long-term liquefied natural gas contracts from China -the world's third largest gas consumer behind the US and Russia- is prolonging South-East Asia's fossil fuel dependency.

This provides quite a bad broader picture.

13

[...]

Rare earths are critical to the green transition, electric vehicles, and defence technologies – making their control a pressing national priority.

"The open international market in critical minerals and rare earths is a mirage. It doesn't exist. And the reason it doesn't exist is because there is one supplier of these materials and they have the wherewithal to change where the market goes, whether that be in pricing or supply," Australia's resources minister Madeleine King says.

Canberra sees government intervention as necessary to provide an alternative supply, and help the world rely less on China.

[...]

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Analysis like these only hurt the fediverse

Instances like lemmygrad.ml hurt the Fediverse. "Their support can extend beyond backing these authoritarian regimes, even cheering on their violent actions, as evidenced by their posts on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Additionally, we observe anti-Zionist and antisemitic behaviors, which show similarities to right-wing extremism."

Aside from some grad and bear communities which are known "cheering on violence", there are many other comms here in Lemmy whose admins and mods support this anti-democratic stance, although with a softer approach. It is them that hurt the Fediverse as this is also a major reason imo why the Lemmy still remains a small niche product.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Austrian company Voestalpine produces the world's first hydrogen-based rail, setting new standards in steel production

Hydrogen-based steel production uses—ideally green—hydrogen from renewable energy sources to separate oxygen from iron ore. Unlike conventional methods, this process does not generate CO2, only water vapor as a byproduct. The hydrogen-reduced pure iron was produced in the HYFOR pilot plant, and the melt was carried out in the company’s proprietary research facility Technikum Metallurgie (TechMet), a one-of-a-kind miniature full-scale steelwork.

Addition:

You maybe interested in the Green Steel Tracker: It show which low-carbon projects have been announced in the steel industry, and aims to support decision makers in policy and industry, academia as well as civil society, by tracking public announcements of low-carbon investments in the steel industry and presenting them transparently in one place.

Regarding the number of project for green steel that are already announced, South Korea's Posco, Luxembourg-based Arcelor Mittal, India's Tata, Germany's Thyssen Krupp, and Sweden's SSAB are leading the way among the large steel conglomerates.

There is also a good overview for the global green cement market by market research group Precedence Research. It list 8 keyplayers: Mexico's CEMEX S.A.B., Japan's Taiheiyo Cement Corporation, the two Chinese companies Anhui Conch Cement and China National Building Material, Brazil's Votorantim cimentos S.A., the two Indian companies UltraTech Cement Ltd. and ACC Limited., Switzerland's LafargeHolcim, Germany's Heidelberg Cement AG, and the Taiwan Cement Corporation.

But the researchers list a lot of very good projects from companies around the globe.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Austrian company Voestalpine produces the world's first hydrogen-based rail, setting new standards in steel production

Hydrogen-based steel production uses—ideally green—hydrogen from renewable energy sources to separate oxygen from iron ore. Unlike conventional methods, this process does not generate CO2, only water vapor as a byproduct. The hydrogen-reduced pure iron was produced in the HYFOR pilot plant, and the melt was carried out in the company’s proprietary research facility Technikum Metallurgie (TechMet), a one-of-a-kind miniature full-scale steelwork.

Addition:

You maybe interested in the Green Steel Tracker: It show which low-carbon projects have been announced in the steel industry, and aims to support decision makers in policy and industry, academia as well as civil society, by tracking public announcements of low-carbon investments in the steel industry and presenting them transparently in one place.

Regarding the number of project for green steel that are already announced, South Korea's Posco, Luxembourg-based Arcelor Mittal, India's Tata, Germany's Thyssen Krupp, and Sweden's SSAB are leading the way among the large steel conglomerates.

There is also a good overview for the global green cement market by market research group Precedence Research. It list 8 keyplayers: Mexico's CEMEX S.A.B., Japan's Taiheiyo Cement Corporation, the two Chinese companies Anhui Conch Cement and China National Building Material, Brazil's Votorantim cimentos S.A., the two Indian companies UltraTech Cement Ltd. and ACC Limited., Switzerland's LafargeHolcim, Germany's Heidelberg Cement AG, and the Taiwan Cement Corporation.

But the researchers list a lot of very good projects from companies around the globe.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago

China polysilicon firms plan $7 billion fund to shut a third of industry capacity

Chinese producers of polysilicon, a building block for solar panels, are in talks to create a 50 billion yuan ($7 billion) fund to acquire and shut down roughly a third of production capacity and restructure part of the loss-making sector, GCL Technology Holdings said.

A first step maybe? It's too little, and very late. Seems China's Leninist changes only if they run out of money. What a difference to the neo-liberal stance (s/)

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

The deal includes $600bn (£446bn) of EU investments in the US ...

Trump made a similar deal with Japan, but this raises eyebrows among economists and analysts. Because neither Japan nor the EU will invest, but rather private companies there are expected to do so. It is to be seen whether they really do it.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 month ago

This is a very weird framing of this study. The original study (which is linked in the article) is in German. Those who don't speak German will find a useful translation provider, I provide the study's summary literal translation:

>Young people: EU and democracy are good, but reforms are needed

  • 57% prefer democracy to any other form of government - 39% think that the EU does not function particularly democratically
  • Young Europeans want change - 53% criticize the EU for being too preoccupied with trivialities instead of focusing on the essentials
  • Cost of living, defense against external threats and better conditions for businesses should be priorities for the EU
  • Only 42% think that the EU is one of the three most powerful global political players

Among others, the study also says (again, a direct translation, I am not paraphrasing):

48% of young Europeans believe that democracy in their country is under threat, compared to 61% in Germany. Two thirds rate their country's membership of the EU as positive. At the same time, 53% of young people criticize the fact that the EU is too often concerned with minor issues. Half of 16 to 26-year-olds think the EU is a good idea, but very poorly implemented.

I don't say that everything is perfect, but the whole study paints a completely different picture than this article - and especially its headline - appears to suggest.

[Edit my comments for clarity, translation has not been edited.]

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 months ago

Amazing how this thread illustrates how many tankie alt accounts are here on Beehaw already.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 months ago

You might have (intentionally?) misunderstood the content.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 5 months ago

Germany says 'blackmail' of Ukraine will bring more war

Germany's foreign minister Annalena Baerbock says Europe must put pressure on the US to stand by its European allies and warned against forcing Kyiv to surrender [...] Baerbock's statements were similar to those of other European leaders discussing how to approach likely changes to transatlantic relations during Trump's second term.

[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 6 months ago

Judge keeps Musk's DOGE from further digging into US Gov's spending

Citing potential “irreparable harm,” US Federal Judge Paul A. Engelmayer Saturday blocked Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing specific records within the Treasury Department, thus acquiescing to a request from New York Attorney General Letitia James and 19 States under Democratic rule.

The plaintiffs contended Musk's team accessing this data could pose risks to cybersecurity and violate federal law by potentially mishandling or exposing sensitive personal and financial information of millions of Americans.

Engelmayer also ruled that any data already accessed by DOGE must be destroyed immediately. This injunction is in place until at least February 14, 2025, when further arguments involving national security, privacy rights, and political motivations, will be heard.

view more: next ›

Hotznplotzn

joined 6 months ago