[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 10 points 1 day ago

There are no left-wing conservatives.

Conservatism is a human extinction comorbidity now.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The EU Scream podcast recently had a nice episode on this topic: EU Scream - Ep.118: Putting Guardrails on Playing God

The recent European heatwave killed some 2,300 people with more than half of deaths attributable to human-caused climate change. But what if temperatures can be lowered using technology? It's a highly charged question. One of the ideas out there is to create a parasol of particles around the earth to reflect sunlight back into space.

Cooling the planet this way is known as solar geoengineering. Many Europeans reject geoengineering outright. They say nobody should be playing God with the climate. Yet exploration of geoengineering, backed by private investors, looks to be zooming ahead. Unregulated. But in anticipation of strong future demand in a world where temperature rises are on course to reach nearly 3 degrees this century. That's way above the 1.5 degree target concluded a decade ago under the Paris climate agreement.

In this episode: a conversation with Cynthia Scharf. Cynthia participated in the Paris climate negotiations as an aide to former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, and she's now with the Brussels-based think-tank, the Center for Future Generations. She is not giving up on the Paris deal from a decade ago. Far from it.

Efforts to drastically cut emissions are essential. But Cynthia also says the time has come to consider the implications of what she calls technologies of desperation like dimming the sun with solar geoengineering.​ And time for the Europe to take a leadership role to determine if the technology can ever be safe and viable — or if it's just too dangerous even to try.

China’s preference for state secrecy makes it unsuitable for such a role, while the US, under Trump, has walked out on climate action and collective security. That leaves the Europe Union well placed to pick up the mantle of responsibility and to try to put up international guardrails against careless or malign use of geoengineering.

Opening up discussion of geoengineering could also help to quell conspiracy theories linked to the technology, like the idea that contrails from aircraft are chemtrails for mind control. Less clearcut is how the EU can promote international governance of solar geoengineering in an era when multilateralism has hit the rocks and anti-science forces are on the rise.

211
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

source

Marko Elez, a 25-year-old employee at Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has been granted access to sensitive databases at the U.S. Social Security Administration, the Treasury and Justice departments, and the Department of Homeland Security. So it should fill all Americans with a deep sense of confidence to learn that Mr. Elez over the weekend inadvertently published a private key that allowed anyone to interact directly with more than four dozen large language models (LLMs) developed by Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI.

On July 13, Mr. Elez committed a code script to GitHub called “agent.py” that included a private application programming interface (API) key for xAI. The inclusion of the private key was first flagged by GitGuardian, a company that specializes in detecting and remediating exposed secrets in public and proprietary environments. GitGuardian’s systems constantly scan GitHub and other code repositories for exposed API keys, and fire off automated alerts to affected users.

Philippe Caturegli, “chief hacking officer” at the security consultancy Seralys, said the exposed API key allowed access to at least 52 different LLMs used by xAI. The most recent LLM in the list was called “grok-4-0709” and was created on July 9, 2025.

27
452

spoiler(bookwheel)

40
submitted 2 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/climate@slrpnk.net
8
submitted 3 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists:

On April 17, 2025, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists held a discussion exploring the risks of climate change and how to understand what planetary shifts are inevitable – and which are solvable – in this current era of scientific skepticism.

Each year, new data strengthens our understanding of the planet's rising temperatures and growing environmental instability. With the increase in uncontrollable wildfires, stronger storms, and rising ocean levels, the question remains of whether we are too late to reverse – or significantly slow – our changing climate.

There have been a few bright spots towards reaching targets set in the Paris Agreement, such as increases in sustainable energy generation and climate finance. Still, these advances have not yet slowed consistent record-breaking heat and a continued year-over-year rise of atmospheric carbon– leaving us to question whether there is a ‘tipping point’ – a threshold beyond which climate change is irreversible.

Speakers include:

Moderator: Alexandra Bell, president and CEO of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

Inez Fung, Professor Emerita of Atmospheric Science in the Department of Earth and Planetary Science and the Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management at the University of California, Berkeley. She is also a member of the Bulletin's Science and Security Board.

Robert Kopp, Distinguished Professor in the Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences at Rutgers University.

Femke Nijsse, Senior Lecturer in Innovation, Energy and Climate at the University of Exeter.

1
submitted 4 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/collapse@sopuli.xyz

There are 3 speakers in this.

University of Tasmania's Associate Prof. Booth as leader of Critical Collapse Studies hosts a critical collapse event with Australian collapsologist and co-founder of JustCollapse, Tristan Sykes, and with German Queer political scientist and climate justice advocate, Dr. Tadzio Muller.

Just Collapse: https://justcollapse.org/

Dr Tadzio Mueller: https://steadyhq.com/en/

Kollaps Camp: https://kollapscamp.de/

1
submitted 4 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/vegan@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/19518954

New research finds the industry’s campaigns to confuse the public about beef’s climate impact go back longer than previously recognized.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 33 points 5 months ago

This one isn't going to age well.

9
submitted 5 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/vegan@lemmy.world
12
submitted 6 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/vegan@lemmy.world

Today we're deep-diving into the rise of the "carnivore"-centric wellness trend that has taken social media by storm over the last year. We discuss influencers like Nara Smith, the beef industry's influencer marketing strategies, and whether vegan brands should be worried.

1
submitted 6 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/vegan@lemmy.world
30
submitted 6 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

This study aims to expand the understanding of public acceptance of carbon taxes by exploring the role of habits. Habits play a pivotal role in guiding our behaviors and reasoning and can even influence our self perception and identity but remain an underexplored variable in relation to public policy acceptance. We employed a large scale (N > 5200) national survey to measure public acceptance of higher carbon taxation in Sweden, also capturing car driving habits, car usage, and other relevant variables. The findings show that habit strength is negatively correlated with policy acceptance, regardless of self reported driving distance, while also appearing to moderate the relationship between policy acceptance and environmental concern and political leaning, variables previously shown to be of relevance. The study suggests that the influence of habits needs to be recognized to better understand the formation of climate policy acceptance, and exploring this perspective paves the way for future research.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 41 points 7 months ago

"Oops, my foot slipped on the wrong pedal."

Intent without confessions and manifestos may not be that easy to prove.

47
submitted 8 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The Bottom Line

Despite widespread consensus on the reality of climate change, misinformation about both the causes and solutions for climate change took hold during the 2024 presidential election. As this type of misinformation continues to impact public discourse, the need for greater media literacy becomes crucial, particularly to counteract the influence of political leaders and foreign-backed campaigns on voter behavior.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 41 points 8 months ago
[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 26 points 9 months ago

Like those honeypot trap "women's clinics" where women don't get access to birth control and abortions.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 55 points 9 months ago

cars bring out the worst in people.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 28 points 11 months ago

Start a religion where the clergy maintain both written and oral versions of your code as a sacred text.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 65 points 11 months ago

Bank: Perfect.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 67 points 11 months ago

I refactor the box every year because there are usually some new cables.

Some simple empirical rules:

  • keep the shorter cables
  • maximum of 3 cables of the same type: for donating, for lending, for spare
  • USB cables that can transfer data > USB cables that don't transfer data
  • no damaged cables
  • store long cables as coils (tied up tight)
  • store short cables in bunches (tied up tight)
  • should be sorted and grouped into categories
  • box should be sealed, but aired out once in a while (outgassing)
view more: next ›

veganpizza69

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF