659
Mematic (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mriormro@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh no! Not a means for a sole developer of a robust, web-based photo editor to make some sort of a living.

The fucking travesty of it all.

Listen, it sucks that it's not open source and that it is now ad-sponsored but the fact remains that there are shockingly poor FOSS alternatives to creative tools (blender is probably one of the few exceptions) and gimp is firmly in that 'shockingly poor' category.

It's okay to be critical of an open source project and use something that may be proprietary. The world isn't going to blow up because of it.

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 7 points 7 months ago

poor FOSS alternatives

So you’d rather have ADs in place of a Layers panel?


For those who can't read between the linesThe fact that it has ADs, is also considered as one of the factors deciding its quality.
And so is the fact that it can't be run when the internet connectivity is slow/non-existent.
Not considering those features as factors while judging the application just gives incentive to everyone else (including the prepaid ones) to include ADs in their UX.

If this is how we promote them, soon, you'll be seeing ADs (on top of the Subscription fees) in Adobe software.
- Hard to believe? Look at Windows.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
659 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

45573 readers
1915 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS