175
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 2 points 1 day ago

I commented this over on the other post.

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

~~Is there also an AI non-original?~~ Nvm, my sorting showed this first so I didn't get it was a reaction to something. This is way better, what was someone thinking when they made an almost exact copy of this image? What's the point?

[-] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is a law or rule or something that says "don't use copyrighted, or portions of works, in programming your a.i. software". To get around that, they make knock-offs and then store them on a third-party site. Then chop-up, reuse, rearrange, re-color, etc... and voila. And will claim, "our a.i. software does not ingest copyrighted stuff, no law broken, good day".

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
175 points (99.4% liked)

Funny

9263 readers
1160 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS