91
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

To quote the related NYT article, "The order means the prosecution of Donald J. Trump in Georgia is effectively frozen, at least through the presidential election."

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

162
Permanently Deleted (www.vanityfair.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Suggesting that Americans inject disinfectants into their veins. Declaring that people believe he’s been treated worse than Abraham Lincoln. Claiming wind turbines are killing whales. Saying environmental regulations are forcing people to flush their toilets “10 times, 15 times as opposed to once.” Over the course of Donald Trump’s 77 years on earth, he’s had a lot of uniquely bizarre comments come out of his mouth. That streak continued over the weekend, as he reportedly suggested to a group of billionaires that Joe Biden had literally shit on a piece of White House furniture.

Archive link to above Vanity Fair article

From the original NY Times article quoted by Vanity Fair:

Mr. Trump blamed his successor, Mr. Biden, for the influx of migrants and mocked him and aides for what Mr. Trump said were bad decisions made around the Resolute Desk, which has been used by two dozen presidents.

“The Resolute Desk is beautiful,” Mr. Trump said. “Ronald Reagan used it, others used it.”

He then denigrated Mr. Biden, sounding disgusted, according to the attendee: “And he’s using it. I might not use it the next time. It’s been soiled. And I mean that literally, which is sad.”

The attendee who witnessed the moment said that dinner guests laughed and that Mr. Trump’s remark was interpreted as the former president saying that Mr. Biden had defecated on the desk.

Archive link

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 141 points 1 year ago

And in today's episode of Totally Un-self-aware,

The company’s founder, Eric Umeofia, refused to budge, however, saying in a recent documentary on the local Arise Television channel that he won’t drop the lawsuit against Okoli and that he would “rather die than allow someone to tarnish my image I worked 40 years to grow.”

So this asshole is the person churning up that poor woman's isolated bad review into ALL the Streisand effect he can possibly get, as hard as he can, to the point that it is now international news how abysmally shitty his product really is, AND he's also the person announcing dramatically that he'd rather die than allow anyone to do that.

Hmmm. Will he ever connect the dots?

Nah. He'll just keep blaming and harassing that poor woman for the rest of his days while people stop buying his product in droves because both it and he leave such a bad taste in the mouth.

456
Permanently Deleted (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Excerpt:

It’s extremely difficult to square this ruling with the text of Section 3 [of the Fourteenth Amendment]. The language is clearly mandatory. The first words are “No person shall be” a member of Congress or a state or federal officer if that person has engaged in insurrection or rebellion or provided aid or comfort to the enemies of the Constitution. The Section then says, “But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.”

In other words, the Constitution imposes the disability, and only a supermajority of Congress can remove it. But under the Supreme Court’s reasoning, the meaning is inverted: The Constitution merely allows Congress to impose the disability, and if Congress chooses not to enact legislation enforcing the section, then the disability does not exist. The Supreme Court has effectively replaced a very high bar for allowing insurrectionists into federal office — a supermajority vote by Congress — with the lowest bar imaginable: congressional inaction.

This is a fairly easy read for the legal layperson, and the best general overview I've seen yet that sets forth the various legal and constitutional factors involved in today's decision, including the concurring dissent by Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 170 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 91 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 157 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

1
Permanently Deleted (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

deleted by creator

261
Permanently Deleted (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Brett Kavanaugh, the US supreme court justice, will “step up” for Donald Trump and help defeat attempts to remove the former president from the ballots in Colorado and Maine for inciting an insurrection, a Trump lawyer said.

“I think it should be a slam dunk in the supreme court,” Alina Habba told Fox News on Thursday night. “I have faith in them.

“You know, people like Kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he’ll step up. Those people will step up. Not because they’re pro-Trump but because they’re pro-law, because they’re pro-fairness. And the law on this is very clear.”

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 87 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 88 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

115

The senior employees described Altman as psychologically abusive, creating chaos at the artificial-intelligence start-up — complaints that were a major factor in the board’s abrupt decision to fire the CEO

Gift link to article: https://wapo.st/3RyScpS

534
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Sam Altman has been fired as CEO of OpenAI, the company announced on Friday.

“Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities,” the company said in its blog post.

EDITED TO ADD direct link to OpenAI board announcement:
https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transition

20
Permanently Deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Permanently Deleted

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 367 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 179 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 97 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you don't mind, please also highlight

health diagnosis data

genetic information

Because omfg, think about those for a second, and how any data that leaves your control is subject to eventual collection by law enforcement, legal or not, and anyone else willing to pay for it (or steal it):

For example, some bonehead rears your vehicle one day, but your health diagnosis data says you have a heart condition, or maybe just high blood pressure. These conditions can involve occasional lightheadedness, though you know yours is well controlled. You don't even think about it anymore because you take care of yourself and all your regular tests are good. But suddenly, you're in this minor accident, not even your fault, and it's no longer a simple rearending because some asshole has brought your health history into it so that YOU and not he will be on the hook for monetary damages.

(Triple if the bozo who hit you is some lame ass drunk rural county sheriff or elected official.)

And "genetic information" is code for DNA. How they would collect your DNA from your car I don't know, but do you REALLY want your genetic information associated with your vehicle and outside the confines of GINA* for the convenience of data sellers? I know I don't. (GINA is also the law that binds companies like 23andMe from selling your genetic data.) But the whole point of trying to legislate personal control over your own genetic information is because of all the dystopian scenarios that can easily evolve from others having it without your consent.

Yet now your car wants it too? Question this. Letting anyone have it by such means does a complete end run around any law meant to keep your personal genetic information private, and guts any rights you may have to your own privacy under the law, because you signed it away. Imagine the billions insurance companies could make, both health and auto, by refusing to pay for this or that because genetically it was a "pre-existing condition" or a "contributing factor" to you getting rearended by a drunk.

I've never been so thrilled to drive an ancient beater in my life.

*Note: GINA is weak already, but legislators are trying to weaken it further still: in 2018 a proposed change meant that "Employers would have been able to demand workers' genetic test results if the bill were to have been enacted."

41
Permanently Deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Permanently Deleted

43
Permanently Deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Permanently Deleted

2
Permanently Deleted (gizmodo.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee moved forward a bill called the Cooper Davis Act that would make tech companies report users suspected of criminal drug activity to the DEA.

See also the ACLU position on this bill at https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-condemns-senate-vote-on-bill-forcing-internet-companies-to-spy-on-users-for-the-dea

view more: next ›

ChunkMcHorkle

joined 2 years ago