It feels like there's reason to inflate those numbers both for Israel and Palestine. Do we know they're credible? Genuinely asking, I'm not sure from my cursory searx.
To be fair, it's best to not participate in the lottery.
Mostly things that fall under the category of women not being able to be a threat/dangerous. Especially white women, which im usually read as.
This includes everything from talking to children in public to actual minor crimes like shoplifting.
ETA: this is in fact a prime example of how sexism is mean to everyone. Women are not dangerous because they're weak, men are dangerous because they're strong. Neither is generally true.
Nah, it's extra hard when your partner looks all cosy cuddly adorable eepy sleepy under their lil blankie und you just want to cuddle up
Power over another person, the prerequisite for most sexual violence, doesn't have to come from superior physical strength. It could come from an age difference, a professor-student or boss-employee dynamic, or some form of blackmail, for example. And the body can experience physical arousal in response to the right stimuli even when you don't want to have sex. You can also do acts of sexual violence that do not require an erect penis.
'Haha you guys only have the choice between conservative and far-right'
only elects conservatives and far-right
-us europeans rn
This has me wondering, are young people actually getting LESS pc literate? I'm sure there's studies about that? It's never occurred to me that growing up with computers but without smartphones was peak conditions for becoming tech literate.
In case Im not the only one who's heard of this for the first time:
“In 2017, the Rohingya were killed, tortured, raped, and displaced in the thousands as part of the Myanmar security forces’ campaign of ethnic cleansing. In the months and years leading up to the atrocities, Facebook’s algorithms were intensifying a storm of hatred against the Rohingya which contributed to real-world violence,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.
Because languages aren't constructed, they 'evolved' naturally from humans communicating with one another for many generations. As such, they aren't intended to be as simple as possible. They aren't intended in the first place. They've grown over time with no regard for whether the rules makes sense because nobody designed those rules, they just happened.
I kept reading and hearing this and since it doesn't happen to me I thought something was wrong with me. So I'd like to add that according to my gyn it's also perfectly normal to not have this happen!
Pointlessly gendered
I've had 2 or more messenging apps for about a decade now because of this.