[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Took 17 year? So the government waited until the movement came of age?

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Meanwhile in America, they are criminalizing being homeless and /or poor

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Okay but when Republicans even have one branch of congress they bring the whole government to a stand still until they get concessions.

Just name the top 5 left/progressive wins over the past 50 years against the top 5 right/consecutive.

Republicans have had version levels of control as well and have dictated what happens to the country the whole time.

You/we have no evidence that the democrats would bring about left policies of given 50 years of unchecked control.

Once again, what even has been their agenda? They have never supported universal health care. They've never supported reducing or ending wars. Arm sales? Nothing. Redistribution of wealth? Nothing. Crisis climate legislation? Nothing. Nationalization of too big to fail corporations? Nothing. Police and justice system reform? Nothing. Money in politics? Nothing. Corruption in the Supreme Court? Nothing. Insider trading by government officials? Nothing. Immigration reform? Nothing.

Can you honestly say the democrats leadership has been even really trying to move the country towards science, facts, and compassion? They don't even try to lie to their base anymore. I'll say it until the day I die. If democrats were as ravenous about left policies as the Republicans or nation would be a better place. Yes they are not purely to blame but they are ment to represent their base voters and haven't put forth a platform that amounts to little more than crumbs. It's a strategy failure the dems are guilty of. Being less authoritarian and oligarchical than your opponent is nice but what's the downside to being 100% against those things? That's what the people want but if we can't get even the platform to represent those ideas, what's the chance of it happening?

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Ya and what have the democrats accomplished over the past 30 to 50 years? It doesn't matter which branch they are in. At every level and field the Democratic party has grossly under delivered. Even their most left and progressive policies have been water downed to the point that they are unrecognizable as left policies. What truly left policy has been signed into law at the federal level? I honestly can't think of one.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Uhhhhhh no. But people are mad that the democrats are starting on the 50 yard line and meeting the Republicans on their 25 yard line.

No one thinks their political wishes will be granted automatically if they win an election. The problem is One party is willing to do anything and everything in their power to achieve what their base wants, while the other won't even give their base a seat at the table. It's even more of a problem when the democrats demand loyalty and then cry when the people most likely to vote for them just stay home one election day. Look at all the popular policies that the democrats won't even put on their platform. It's crazy to think people are naive and dumb when they are going to lose regardless.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Are you willing to risk your mother's, sisters, and daughters bodily autonomy on a under performing political party?

I'm not saying leaving will be easy. And I'm not saying it paradise and blue States. But I am saying red states don't deserve you. Start making a plan at least because they won't stop.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Your argument would actually make sense if the president had to do things by themselves and didn't have access to millions of people and Trillions of dollars. Once again they never even put left ideals in their platform let alone tried to get any of them done. Grow up dude. Like I said no one is neive to think they'll get everything they want when it comes to politics. But when your party is already standing on the middle line and meeting the other party on 3/4th of the way, it's a problem.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Yuppy, they got 1 out of 10000 issues right. But did they continue using that as a springboard to get other things right? Nope.

No inflation? Yes, but did they investigate companies that price gouged during the pandemic? Very little to none.

Low unemployment? But are those high quality jobs that would lift people out of poverty? Nope.

Recession? Not for those at the top. Us normal people have been in a 30 year recession.

Everyone knows that if the Democratic party was just as ravenous as Republicans but for left policies our country would be better off.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yup the ACA was little more than a hand out to the insurance companies. The original version off set the government subsidies to insurance companies with a tax penalty to the uninsured or under insured. Republicans removed that so now insurance companies can double dip while the middle class has to essentially pay for their insurance twice. Once in deductibles and premiums, and another time in taxes to cover the insurance companies losses. The ACA privatizes the profits while subsidizing the losses.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

No shit. Companies can simply say they are offseting opposed to actually doing anything. It like asking a Capitan Planet villain to be honest.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Marginally addressed. Like I get it. He's better than Trump, but so is 50% of the average person I see outside. There is no effectively addressed, when we know the tested, studied, and actually implemented solutions.

For example: The ACA. Yes an improvement from what came before but a quarter baked bandaid on the bullet wound of a health care system. We know universal health care system is the answer. It's a fact. The Democratic party never once made that a core part of their platform. Even if you know you won't get everything when working in a democracy you still have to argue from a far left position so when you compromise it's a stronger shift. The middle ground between universal health care coverage and 100% free market is the public option. Where Americans can decide between government coverage or private. But the ACA essentially forced everyone above the poverty line into private insurance held up by government subsidies.

Another example: instead of being 100% anti genicide the Democrat leadership landed on reducing the sizes of bombs given to Isreal?! What's the middle ground between the 100% pro genicide party and the 75% genicide party? Ya ones better but if we land on a compromise of 87% genicide, did we really achieve anything?

Income inequality: Republicans 100% pro oligarchy Democratic party leadership is 75% pro oligarchy. The party of facts and science knows our economy with collapse every 20 to 30 years to keep the jinga Tower from crumbling to the foundation so what do they do? Bail out the companies that destroyed the economy in the first place and reset the lopsided tower. If we bail out a company why shouldn't it also be nationalized?!

I can keep going on. Every issue the Democratic party's solutions are little more than the queen saying, "let them eat cake."

I live in a solid blue state and surround myself with far left people because we've realized, expecting the federal government to improve your life is a fools errand. We're building our own bubble of compassion, science, and facts. Yes we vote blue but know the only change we can truly make starts by getting involved in our community and surrounding ourselves with those that will fight from a strong position and not a already right leaning position. If we're going to die it'll be with a Molotov cocktails in one hand and surround by those that actually care about each other. Opposed to at the feet of the oligarchy begging for crumbs.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

In over 50% of America's land area Rapists get to pick the mother of their child.

Flee red states.

The only why they'll learn is if the rational people leave. The whole fill strategy will never work because red states need you more than you need them.

Flee red states!

Project 2025 advocates for tracking of child barring age women and girls. They will turn you into brood sows the moment they get a chance and justify it as the moral good.

Flee red states!

Blue states aren't perfect but we at least know what freedom is and don't need a 2000 yeast old book to decide what we should do next.

111
Meta (lemmy.world)
63
submitted 1 month ago by NatakuNox@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
9

I get the history as to why we got to our current economic situations, but no one is arguing for a system that casts off current economic issues that are pushing humanity towards destruction. I'm not saying this can happen over night or even within our current life time, but it's obvious that capitalism and even socialism has reached the end of their usefulness.

464
80
submitted 5 months ago by NatakuNox@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Please only consensual stories.

529
1
Texas Freedom! (lemmy.world)
0
152
submitted 1 year ago by NatakuNox@lemmy.world to c/aww@lemmy.world
623
155
submitted 1 year ago by NatakuNox@lemmy.world to c/aww@lemmy.world
824

Yup, boarder towns in red states are going to start stopping women as they travel through their towns to make sure they aren't pregnant.

view more: next ›

NatakuNox

joined 1 year ago