don't let google alter the deal by Vocalize8711 in c/privacy@lemmy.world
[-] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Security should not control us, we should control security. In other words, this is not the right solution.

Supply and demand by Vocalize8711 in c/memes@slrpnk.net
[-] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Channel it to an underground phase change storage.

GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating systems — group says it will never require personal information by Vocalize8711 in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That comes with the price of lower reliability, highly non-linear behaviour and a central point of failure (or control). But, its thr user's choice.

Google Search is now using AI to replace headlines by Vocalize8711 in c/technology@lemmy.world
Systemd’s New Feature Brings Age Verification Option to Linux by Vocalize8711 in c/linux@programming.dev
[-] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

A man of culture, I see. Every system I admin runs SysVInit or OpenRC. I do not need a 'dictator' like systemd.

We can just do the adult check thing the usual way. by Vocalize8711 in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
[-] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

By definition of this new law, is Linux an OS? It is technically just the kernel. At what layer of the software stack does the responsibility of age verification lie at?

Vocalize8711

joined 2 months ago