265
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bonn2@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was wondering when I would see this headline. I wonder if any other big names will make similar statements.

[-] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Linux Distros (so far) Refusing Age Verification

EDIT
I recommend going to Ageless Linux's site and reading up on their take on the whole issue. They clearly illustrate how poorly thought out the California law is.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

I think this might be the first and only time I'll ever see Omarchy getting upvotes on this site.

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Linux Distros (so far) Refusing Age Verification

The systemd dude, ever so flexible as long as the request does not come from actual users, is already working on adding this into core components, though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] kabe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I also wonder whether or not grapheneos, or open source Linux OSs in general, will face any repercussions for failing to comply to these regulations due to the relatively low user count.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 21 points 1 week ago

Hate to say it but systemd, the init system of most Linux distros, already has PRs with maintainer backing to implement DoB recording.

Some people can't kneel fast enough.

[-] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

The self-important creator of Systemd has personally blocked that PR, if I'm hearing correctly, which would suggest he or his employer Microsoft is all in on it.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.

"I'm not picking a side" and "this future proofs standardization" is of little comfort, that is seriously suspect. I ought to look to alternatives to SystemD(odge the issue failed).

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So in other words, "Sure we built the people-crushing machines, but we didn't wire them up or turn them on."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

He left MS in January

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That has already been closed

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe this'll take the shine off that wunderkinder mess and people will finally be free to choose something more reliable. I love how RH pushed this beta software so hard and my reboots are now just shite -- unreliable and occasionally ridiculously delayed.

I'll be glad to see the back of that metastatic shitball.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] voluble@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

"If GrapheneOS devices can't be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it."

Wonder if Motorola feels the same way.

[-] Flipper@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago

They can just sell their normal phone. As long as the user is able to run the installer it doesn't really matter.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

During prohibition era, there was a brick of dried grapes being sold as a nutrition supplement or something like that, but it had a "warning" sticker attached saying specifically not to dissolve it in a specific quantity of water, and if that were to happen, do not let a specific quantity of yeast to fall in it, and especially not to let it sit for 6 weeks, or else you might end up with wine, which is forbidden!

I can see a cheeky sort of company selling a phone with a little warning label attached to it.....

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 11 points 1 week ago

Lol. The US is not the only market.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago

And the US isn't the only place pulling this shit.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Wonder if Motorola feels the same way.

Motorola phones will have both Graphene and Android.

Imagine if California then declared a ban on the sale of GrapheneOS compatible phones.

would be fun to see.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Good. Put that energy into a moderate parental control education fund or something. The ID gating the net is only for control.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

CA's law is "per child". I guarantee lawyers are foaming at the mouth to claim every child in CA was hurt so they can line their pockets. CA's public protection laws seem to be for the purposes of enriching lawyers. I'd love to see how many class action suits would get filed if lawyer fees were put under a hard cap.

[-] Archr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

"lawyers" can't bring charges for this law. Only the AG. If people don't like what the AG is doing then they can just start a recall election.

[-] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 15 points 1 week ago

this is why its a poggers operating system

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] versionc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I'm gonna have to replace my phone soon since it doesn't receive security updates any more and I was thinking of going for GrapheneOS. What do you guys think about getting a Pixel 10 for that purpose? My second choice would be an iPhone but it's both a lot more expensive and also less privacy respecting.

I was also considering a Fairphone but despite rating the repariability highly, there were too many other cons to the device.

[-] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Depends on your angle. The Pixel is a good phone and the OS works well, but it is a Google device. A growing minority wants to avoid investing in US big corp, or in anything US related in general given the current political situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

It's about time I flash that onto my pixel 6 pro.

Now if only GrapheneOS was easy to install on cheap Android devices.

[-] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Grapheneos is surprisingly the most easy OS to install... The issue is most phone manufacturer's dont meet Grapheneos its standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] just2look@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

They have reached a deal with Motorola, so hopefully there will be more options soon. You can get we used pixels pretty cheap though, and the installation process is very easy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Cheap android devices don't have the proper security hardware. Hopefully the Motorola phone is cheaper than a pixel though. Used pixels are also pretty cheap, all things considered.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Good boys !

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
265 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83246 readers
870 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS