[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Les enfants de moins de 5 ans probablement ?

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The thing is that in a polarised world you support one side or the other, and the sides are the US and China. US is certainly not better deserving support than China, but liberals will call tankie anyone who support China in any way, shape or form. For a liberal it's completely inacceptable to say that China is doing anything better than the US.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's in theory. In practice it's only used by liberals to insult leftist when they criticise the US or liberalism.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Exactly this! I've never seen the term used by anyone but liberals to taunt, attack or divert a debate.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's funny how France created all its neighbours! Britain, Russia, Italy, Spain! And proceeded to go into mortal wars with most of them!

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Fukushima, in 2024,is a city of 272569 inhabitants. If that's unlivable, I'm fine with it. Hiroshima, Nagazaki and Chernobyl are all inhabited too.

Saying that nuclear stuff makes places unlivable is plain wrong, it's anti-science. It's comics level of bullshit science. Travel in time is a more serious theory than nuclear stuff destroying the planet.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Chernobyl yes, let's talk about it : after the catastrophy, 2 reactors were used until very recently (like until 10 or 20 years ago).

After the catastrophy, Chernobyl was made into an exclusion zone where people wouldn't be allowed to live. But people came back 10 years after and it's a small village now.

BTW even Hiroshima and Nagazaki that were annihilated with atomic bombs, that is weapons meant to destroy whole cities, were quickly inhabited again.

So much for the permanent destruction and millions of years of contamination. CO2 is a far more deadly compound for mankind than any radioactive material. Anti-nuke militants are merely ignorant fanatics.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

And that cannot happen. It's a fear people have because they equate a nuclear power plant with a nuclear bomb. That is as wrong as considering the earth flat.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

A nuclear power plant cannot destroy a city.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago

Renewable are so cheap, especially when we don't need as much energy! Fortunately we won't need as much energy in winter now. :-)

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago

Sometimes I wonder if these people understand that no player ever wanted exclusivities on a game store. Instead of providing a decent service, they're litteraly trying to kidnap customers with a choice between waiting for months for this big release or taking it on a subpar platform.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago

That's called cooking. And we usually call it meat instead of dead animal, because it's a specific part of the dead animal that's tasty and nutritive once cooked.

view more: next ›

bouh

joined 1 year ago