[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Not the op, but afaik they're just a new implementation.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

That they're everywhere. I have uBO on my browser and actively choose against places and experiences with advertising whenever I can, but it still feels like it's everywhere. Hey, that's a nice mountain. Can you not with the billboard? It's like sponsored vandalism.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You know how Trump supporters are like, "he says what we're all thinking!"?

The future first gentleman actually does.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Cool. Glad we agree on that, at least. Cheers!

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

"Believe women" doesn't mean "use the trauma of abused women as a costume to lend legitimacy to your baseless attacks," pal.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Please clarify.

Nah, honestly, by now the length of this conversation is way out of proportion to my interest in it. I'm not convinced by your argument even a little bit, but I'm really not compelled by talking about it anymore. Have a good one.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Seems like the current plan is to just wipe out all generational wealth instead, for every ancestry. We've given up on a rising tide lifting all boats and instead we're draining the harbor.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I don't believe reparations are politically possible right now, but "we can't fix the problem so we shouldn't even try" just doesn't feel like the right move here.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It'll be on the first Starship from Mars.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

THIS IS AN OP-ED

For crying out loud, you'd think this bot would know the difference

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Whether or not it will be prosecuted is immaterial to whether or not it is legal.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago
  • Wohl and Burkman were sentenced to community service.

  • The charge they pled guilty to was fraud; that they "falsely claimed that mail-in voting would put voters into a database that would be used to collect outstanding debt, track down warrants or enforce mandatory vaccinations." It doesn't matter what the outcome was (intimidation or something else), the fraud was the crime.

  • Fox is a slightly different case, as they're technically press and thus have a first amendment protection that automatically makes any case against them harder. But either way, the lack of prosecution is far from evidence that a crime was not committed.

  • I already identified exactly which law Musk is breaking and with what action. 52 USC 20511 and 52 USC 30101, if you find it particularly important.

27
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by ilinamorato@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world

In the latest Messages for Android Beta, scheduled send is broken due to a date validation bug. It won't let you schedule messages after today's date number in any month. So, for instance, today's date is 29 November, 2023; it won't allow any messages to be scheduled in December unless they're scheduled on the 29th, 30th, or 31st. Also, it won't allow any messages to be scheduled in 2024, for what I assume are similar reasons.

Reverting to the latest stable version fixes it and allows messages to be scheduled for any future date.

view more: next ›

ilinamorato

joined 1 year ago