[-] merci3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a fair take, but even still, someone who goes out of their way to get to fdroid and install Fennec should very well be aware of alternatives to Google.

An argument that discards knowledge as a factor only makes sense to me in a context of a tech illiterate installing Firefox directly from the Play Store.

Also, from my own knowledge (correct me if I'm wrong) the point of Fennec is to be as FOSS as possible, and not to have all the provacy-oriented defaults, if that were the case, I presume it would come with uBlock preinstalled, for example.

It's also worth mentioning that Fennec never changes what defaults you set with updates (at least in my personal experience, would like to hear if anyone had a different story) EDIT my own default settings was changed to Google later that day. So can't argue on that ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I know Google is bad and all, but in the case of Fennec, is it really that big of a deal? I say that because someone who knows how to get Fennec on their phones will also be aware on what search engine they use, so it's not like the maintainer is advertising Google or anything IMO

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Alternatively, you could try to install a GSI instead of a fully custom built ROM, that's how I got a custom rom back when I had a Samsung A03 Core. But even then, the way android is locked down on each device along the absurdly short support Motorola offers is really infuriating.

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I daily drive a moto g14 for about a year now. A rather basic phone, but thankfully still didnt have any software related issues yet :P hope motorola gives some care to your model tho

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

The reason why I stick with motorola is because the Android they ship is the closest to pure AOSP. (From what's avaiable in my country)

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

dumb fuck โ€ผ๏ธ

467
submitted 2 weeks ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Single core, 32 bit CPU, can't even do video playback on VLC. But it kinda works for some offline work, like text editing, and even emulation through zsnes! It's crazy how Linux keeps old hardware like this running.

Thankfully though, this laptop CPU is upgradable, and so is the ram, so I'm planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century ๐Ÿ˜„

138
bite (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
346
I use Debian btw (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
45
Eat it (lemmy.world)
219
135
submitted 3 months ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I tried out most (if not all) of the music players on flathub, but I always end up going back to Rhythmbox. It's so simple, lightweight, got just enough features (for my use case) and blends well with GTK Desktops (I mostly use Gnome and Cinnamon) and it looks so clean in my Nord theme ๐Ÿ˜†

How has your experience with Rhythmbox? do y'all got any alternative you think everybody should give a try? I personally think Elisa is a close second!

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 127 points 5 months ago

Canonical deserves most of the critics they get.

Ubuntu users on the other hand don't deserve even the slight amount of critic they get for just.. Using Ubuntu. like, at least they use Linux, we should be encouraging them to keep using it.

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 106 points 6 months ago

Mint is the best distro for the average user who doesnt want to tinker with their OS or doesnt want to waste time fixing issues.

IF Mint doesnt go well with your laptop, I would try out Fedora, which is more up to date with stuff and also very user friendly choose Fedora Workstation if you're feeling adventurous. choose Fedora KDE if you want a Windows like experience.

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago

In my personal opinion: 1- Snap packages. Dont like them for their closed source backend, dont lime them for how canonical has been sneaking then into the system of users who have been originally trying to install a deb.

2- Modern Ubuntu simply has no real benefit compared to other Distros. Nowadays it's just another Gnome and Debian-based distro, I see no reason to use it over Debian itself, or Fedora, Solus, or any other Ubuntu derivative that simply does better than "vanilla" Ubuntu, such as Pop!_OS or Linux Mint.

I don't hate Ubuntu, and I recognize it's importance for Linux as a desktop in it's early days, but Canonical really lost track of themselves.

5
submitted 7 months ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
[-] merci3@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

LMDE. Not Ubuntu based, but Debian based so its the closest I can think on the top of my head. It got 32 bit support and Cinnamon desktop.

79
submitted 1 year ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/artshare@lemmy.world
105
submitted 1 year ago by merci3@lemmy.world to c/artshare@lemmy.world
[-] merci3@lemmy.world 220 points 2 years ago

Alternatively, some folks can also try Freetube for an ad free youtube experience as a desktop app

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

Now they are fight attendants

view more: next โ€บ

merci3

joined 2 years ago