7
I made this banner; but I can't use it until the image upload restrictions are lifted.
But Democrat-aligned groups saw something else in the Republicans’ about-face: disingenuousness.
72
- Your account is defined by your email address
- Your email address is unchangeable
- You can create a new account with a new email address, but you can't re-register the same printer, because it was already registered to your old email address
This means you can be locked out of registering your printer. Why are all printer companies the stupidest companies ever?
1
This is satire.
(lemmy.world)
Made me a thing today. Fun fact: almost all fortune cookies are made in one factory in New York. No, that doesn't mean I think they are "American", not really.
Good. It's not even AI. That word is just used because ignorant people eat it up.
Imagine being able to just waste $400 mil. While 40% of the people in the same, richest country on Earth are living paycheck to paycheck, trying not to become homeless.
-1
I know I'll get downvoted to hell for this even though I'm literally posting the kind of stuff Unpopular Opinion is here for, but so be it.
I can't even make out the faces most of the time in BotW. Just look at the screenshots for yourself. And it always bugged me just how featureless and uninteresting Link's face looked, especially his eyes. Compare it to literally any other Link's face (in-game for 3D, artwork for 2D).
In contrast, Pokémon XY had really good cel-shading for the Pokémon during battles. I was honestly impressed that a 3DS could have such a high polygon count and such clean, clear cel-shading lines and colors during its battles. For some odd reason, I have not seen such clean cel-shading before or since.
I would also like to say that Skyward Sword on the Wii had a much cleaner, more detailed, more beautiful look than Breath of the Wild did, and I will die with those words.
It just goes to show you that there is simply no replacement for good art direction— raw power and long draw distance aren't enough.
I came here to say this. Like, they're not wrong.
Protesting.
The future looks scary to me.
It's getting old telling people this, but... the AI that we have right now? Isn't even really AI. It's certainly not anything like in the movies. It's just pattern-recognition algorithms. It doesn't know or understand anything and it has no context. It can't tell the difference between a truth and a lie, and it doesn't know what a finger is. It just paints amalgamations of things it's already seen, or throws together things that seem common to it— with no filter nor sense of "that can't be correct".
I'm not saying there's nothing to be afraid of concerning today's "AI", but it's not comparable to movie/book AI.
Edit: The replies annoy me. It's just the same thing all over again— everything I said seems to have went right over most peoples' heads. If you don't know what today's "AI" is, then please stop assuming about what it is. Your imagination is way more interesting than what we actually have right now. This is why we should have never called what we have now "AI" in the first place— same reason we should never have called things "black holes". You take a misnomer and your imagination goes wild, and none of it is factual.
Imagine living in a world where you can launch a bill to stop the investigation of a high-profile insurrection involving a president who doesn't want to grant a peaceful transfer of power, and you don't just immediately lose status and/or go to prison.
God we are an awful species.
Excuse me, but as a middle child, I have to absolutely object to that last statement. Middle children have their own unique sibling/personality complexes. :P
Oh wait, I don't exist. Wow, that's a stealthy, mean joke. That cuts, fam.
Okay, but depending on how "female" is said, it is often used in a derogatory way by incels and misogynists.
Don't forget your dual-wheel, 4D+ mouse!
view more: next ›
Most of these clearly have no proper etymology and root/suffix/prefix structure, and therefore are clearly made up.