Wouldn't the argument be that they aren't compelling speech, but preventing the execution of non-compliant code?
Sure, devs could publish software without age verification, but running it would be illegal.
Yep, that's the one!
Why does the article compare kilograms of food instead of equivalent calorie amounts?
The study provides data per 100g of protein, which seems like more useful comparison.
But selling the crown would drive the price of crowns down so low (supply and demand, you know) and you'd never actually get 8 billion. Best you'd get is... maybe one roundabout and a nice tree.
Jesus fuck, you censor the word "motherfucker" but leave the author's name intact?
At this rate, my entire comment history is just going to be mini freakouts about fucking cunts censoring "fucking cunt" on the internet. We're allowed to be dicks here. Talking about dicks is fine.
Don't bend over backwards to make this space advertiser friendly. Be weird!
I read the post title as "assigned landlord at birth" for a moment, and I was like, yeah that is probably true for most people with money.
Now to restore cosmic balance: bitch fuck bitch fuck.
Who the fuck is out here censoring fuck?
Netscape Navigator coming in with the real facts.
Why do people censor fuck or other profanity on the internet? I don't get it, and until now, I've been too afraid to ask.
Flipping a bit in software doesn't cost Tesla anything, the hardware is already installed.
It would be totally different if Tesla didn't install the hardware by default, and you had to pay to have it put in.
More like saying it's legal to publish the plans for a gun, but illegal for the layperson to build maybe?