So I should suffer just to suffer? You listed a whole lot of things that they hire people to do just about as soon as they can so they can. And offloading that let's them do their actual job better

I work with black boxes all the time. When I have a black box, I poke and prod it until I understand how to make it do what I want. And this particular black box was interesting, so I decided to open it up and learn how it works

That's the essence of software development. My job is not typing or data entry, my job is to trick a rock into doing things humans don't want to do

I've been doing it for more than a decade without help, I'm not any better at spelling or misclicks

And to be clear, I can do it - I just really, really don't want to. I hate it so much, my eyes glaze over and I have to force myself every second of the way. It's not interesting, there's no puzzles involved... It's basically data entry

No, it's all different - like a normal use case is "write me a stored procedure to optionally update all fields on a row on this table" or "given the following json response, build a class to parse it into"

We have a ridiculous database and multiple new api's to integrate with every year, so this comes up a lot

I use it so much. All my Google searches for syntax or snippets? Web searches are unuseable at this point, AI can spit it out faster. But the real savings? Repetitive code. I suck at it, I always make typos and it's draining. I just toss in a table or an api response and tell it what I want and boom

It probably does write 75% of my code by lines, but maybe 5% of the business logic is AI (sometimes I just let it take a crack at a problem, but usually if I have to type it out I might as well code it)

What it's good at drains my concentration, so doing the grunt work for me is a real force multiplier. I don't even use it every day, but it might be a 3x multiplier for me and could improve

But here's the thing - programmers are not replaceable. Not by other humans, not by AI - you learn hyper specific things about what you work on

I always tell people "I need something to ignore"

And it's mostly true...I need background sound. And not just white noise - I need something with meaning

Put me in nature, and I'm fine. Bird tweets, rustling of the leaves - I'm at peace. I'll hear even a squirrel hundreds of yards away, but I know what's going on. I just need to know what's going on around me in a way that makes sense. The creaking of the building, distant cars, muffled footsteps... Just the unnatural silence

That's what freaks me out

It'll be a bit late then.

I know how compliance works, and this is setting off all my alarm bells, and the EFF and privacy community agrees... This has truly horrifying implications

If you're going to let human rights be further erroded because it came in a pretty explanation, not much I can do. But when the next patriot act comes back to bite us, remember one thing... When they say it's about the children, it never is

That's what they say it does. What it really does is make sites responsible for "harmful content" shown to minors

It's all completely vague. You say it just affects the kids mode accounts... The bill doesn't say anything about that. It doesn't provide any guidance on how to properly comply, just like the porn id laws.

You can't assume the government is going to use this for what they say they will. You have to look at what this would let them do as written

Ultimately, this gives the government censorship powers over what is allowed in the "open" Internet, and to IDs users in the "adult" Internet

Because that's not what this is. It's just like the porn site laws

How does a site comply? Maybe they use AI to look at your face, maybe they have you send in your license. The law isn't clear what's enough to prove it.

How long until third parties step up? Nice convenient orgs that can sell the collected data that can guarantee compliance, because they sell the data to the government directly. Or even first parties... Facebook and Google are happy to sell this kind of info on their users

This isn't about protecting kids, it's about identifying users. What they say this is for is good, what the laws actually do is far removed from that

Do not ask people how to do this. If you don't know from a web search, you shouldn't try this without backing up a full disk image and understanding how to roll it back. Or at least backing up everything you care about

It's not a particularly hard thing, but it's a very irreversible one

You cannot join hands with fascists. Ever. For any reason. It's a completely braindead move, look at history

Joining hands with fascists is empowering them and volunteering yourself as the next enemy. They'll turn on you long before they finish with their current enemy

If banning tik tok ends up galvanizing demand for healthcare reform I'm going to laugh my ass off

Days after exposing himself as a fake poser of a gamer, Elon has conveniently (again) reminded us he's also a fake poser of a programmer