The future is ~~webp~~ JPEG XL...
And telling software patents to burn in hell.
It wouldn't, a simple finite state machine that any intelligent entity could emulate would be enough.
But people have completely deluded themselves into thinking that (what CEOs and marketers call) "AI" is actually intelligent, and this case study shows how preposterous that fantasy actually is.
There are only two genders...
Except for: <giant list of genetic, epigenetic, developmental, etc... things that happen with human beings>.
Not to mention all the other things that happen with other living things
That's 41 degrees for everyone who doesn't measure things in bird per gun.
What to know about blue supermoons:
There's a reason Teams is/was shit.
The first teams was written in AngularJS (which is a slow to run resource hog, but fast to develop) wrapped in Electron. It was kind of a minimum viable product, just to build something quickly to get some feedback and stats on what people needed.
The plan was to build a new native version of teams and build it into the next windows while having an web fallback (built on react) for everyone else.
They stopped working on the original teams and started working on the new versions.
They got half-way through working on the native and react versions when suddenly, covid happened.
They couldn't keep working on the new versions because they wouldn't be ready for a while, so they had to go back and resume development on the old one, introducing patch after patch to quickly get more features in there (like more than 2 webcam streams per call).
Eventually covid subsided and they were able to resume development on the new teams versions.
Windows 11 launched with a native teams version (which has less features but runs super quick), and the new react based teams (which can now be downloaded in a webview2 wrapper) has been in open beta since late last year (if you've seen the "Try the new Teams" toggle, then you've seen this). The React+Webview2 teams will replace the AngularJS+Electron version as the default on July 7th.
That's not pro, that's just reckless gambling.
"the means" in this case would be authoritarian repression.
"The means" always has to be something bad for the "ends" to try and justify reaching for "the means".
Github has always had being a job site be it's secondary feature.
Except that it has a slightly higher bar of entry to recruiters and recruitment bots spreading toxic positivity, and anyone asking for a job is able to prove (at least some of) their value by showing off their code and how they participate publically in other repos (if at all).
And yet people will blindly trust AI ~~hallucinated~~ generated results...
cURL was one of these for a while (according to my limited understanding)
It was made in the 90s and it didn't get commercial support until a few years ago.
It's not about caring, it's about the lawyers making the argument javascript's genericness easier