[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

The browser version at least does not have the ability to take screenshots, but you will always be tracked on the websites you use, especially if their business model is advertising-based

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

I think you could do it but you would have to move quick.

Slice the spaghettloaf into two slices, and spread mayo on one side of each slice. Keep the spaghettloaf in the fridge until youre ready to go.

You want a sizable pool of oil with a high smoke point - heat it up until it's nearly smoking, then quickly add 2 sliced spaghetti, mayoless side down. The first side in the oil will form the inside of your grilled cheese, let it sizzle until it starts to crisp, then flip, add your cheese and let both outsides sizzle a minute to gain structure.

Once both outsides have some rigidity, fold the sandwich together. Continue to flip & cook until desired color is reached.

Sprinkle with salt, pepper, fresh parsley, and a little parmesan cheese, and dip in your favorite marinara sauce.

Recipe can be made vegan with vegan cheese and mayo.

23
138
1
1
[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 55 points 5 days ago

save you a click: it's in-app tracking and device screenshots. Don't install apps that have a working website. Also don't use Facebook.

“There were no audio leaks at all – not a single app activated the microphone,” said Christo Wilson, a computer scientist working on the project. “Then we started seeing things we didn’t expect. Apps were automatically taking screenshots of themselves and sending them to third parties. In one case, the app took video of the screen activity and sent that information to a third party.”

Out of over 17,000 Android apps examined, more than 9,000 had potential permissions to take screenshots. And a number of apps were found to actively be doing so, taking screenshots and sending them to third-party sources.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

Takes me longer to unlock my phone than just pull a card out of my wallet

115

Not sure if this counts as a meme, but same Kangaroos, same...

196

255 grams per week. That's the short answer to how much meat you can eat without harming the planet. And that only applies to poultry and pork.

Beef cannot be eaten in meaningful quantities without exceeding planetary boundaries, according to an article published by a group of DTU researchers in the journal Nature Food. So says Caroline H. Gebara, postdoc at DTU Sustain and lead author of the study."

Our calculations show that even moderate amounts of red meat in one's diet are incompatible with what the planet can regenerate of resources based on the environmental factors we looked at in the study. However, there are many other diets—including ones with meat—that are both healthy and sustainable," she says.

243
43
19
39
231
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works to c/climate@slrpnk.net
82
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The message is everywhere: You (alone) can save the planet

Choose a veggie burger instead of beef. Book this flight, not that one. Buy thrift over fast fashion. Shrink your "carbon footprint."

But here's what most people don't know: The very concept of a personal carbon footprint originated with oil giant British Petroleum (BP). In 2004, BP launched a carbon calculator to persuade people to measure their personal climate impacts. The campaign worked — shifting our collective gaze from fossil fuel companies, the biggest drivers of the climate crisis, to individuals like you and me.

Two decades later and with climate disasters rapidly intensifying, we're still caught in this sleight-of-hand. Choices made by corporations and governments continue to shape the speed and scale of climate disruption, while marketing campaigns around climate action try to shift our focus to consumer decisions.

New WRI research tells a different story. Our data shows that pro-climate behavior changes, such as driving less or eating less meat, could theoretically cancel out all the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions an average person produces each year^1^ — specifically among high-income, high-emitting populations.

But it also reveals that efforts focused exclusively on changing behaviors, and not the overarching systems around them, only achieve about one-tenth of this emissions-reduction potential. The remaining 90% stays locked away, dependent on governments, businesses and our own collective action to make sustainable choices more accessible for everyone. (Case in point: It's much easier to go carless if your city has good public transit.)

...

Voting at both the national and local levels is key, as elections directly determine whether governments enable or hinder pro-climate behaviors.

...

Systemic pressure creates enabling conditions, but individuals need to complete the loop with our daily choices. It's a two-way street — bike lanes need cyclists, plant-based options need people to consume them. When we adopt these behaviors, we send critical market signals that businesses and governments respond to with more investment.

WRI's research quantifies the individual actions that matter most. While people worldwide tend to vastly overestimate the impact of some highly visible activities, such as recycling, our analysis reveals four significant changes that deliver meaningful emissions reductions. In order of climate impact, these behaviors are:

  1. Shift to sustainable ground travel
  1. Shift to air travel alternatives
  1. Install residential solar and increase home energy efficiency
  1. Eat more plant-rich meals
[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 123 points 9 months ago

Unpaid Linux ambassadors? Isn't that just Lemmy?

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 107 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Saw this question posted elsewhere, so I'm paraphrasing somebody else, but the privacy benefits of Graphene OS are ESPECIALLY impactful if you're using invasive apps. The whole point of setting up all of the extra sandboxing, storage limits, network restrictions, yadda yadda yadda, is specifically for people who might need or want to still leverage some apps from bigger, less trusted providers.

I'll flip the question, if you're only using trusted, vetted, open source applications, do you even need GrapheneOS? Why not LineageOS, which also comes free of gapps?

And this also fully neglects the inherent distinction between privacy and security. Maybe you trust google knowing you called your mom last night, but you don't want your oppressive conservative government accessing your phone to view your Signal messages to your Grinder date. There's more to privacy than just the number of times your phone pings Google Telemetry servers.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 123 points 10 months ago

Yeah but it's a lot harder to paint climate activists as the bad guys when you say things like "they souped our glass and powdered our rocks", so better to just lie, right?

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 116 points 1 year ago

Y'all still preordering video games? I thought we had talked about this.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 251 points 1 year ago

I find it hard to imagine wanting to have kids just so your dictator has more meat to feed into his meat grinder. Perhaps the only good news is Putin hopefully doesn't have 18 more years in him, so the kids won't have to deal with him directly, but who knows who will sit in the throne next...

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 117 points 2 years ago

"We tried raising prices to meet our margin targets, and now we're all out of ideas"

-every MBA at Target

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 107 points 2 years ago

Musk didn't buy Twitter to control the conversation, he bought it because his ego was too massive to just shut the fuck up for a minute and admit it was a stupid idea.

He tried to pull out after he came to the same realization literally everyone had been shouting at him for months but was legally in too deep.

view more: next ›

RvTV95XBeo

joined 2 years ago