dw is correct.
DW:
'Glory to Ukraine' army chant invokes nationalist past
... wut?
dw is correct.
DW:
'Glory to Ukraine' army chant invokes nationalist past
... wut?
However it was in the 1930s when it really took hold, becoming a rallying cry for the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), explained Oleksandr Zaitsev, a historian from the Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv.
The Nazis also didn't invent the "Heil!" exclamation or the roman salute. It's still not ok to do either of these things. Not to mention the Swastika.
Stepen Bandera wasn’t the one who made the phrase popular. [...] Check your OWN LINK if you want proof.
Ok, I "checked" my own link:
However it was in the 1930s when it really took hold, becoming a rallying cry for the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), explained Oleksandr Zaitsev, a historian from the Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv.
The problem is that those people (leftist prostest not-voters) most likely wouldn't have changed the results.
I think it fits.
What about that bloke who started all this stuff about alpha and beta wolves?
OP is talking about hhe meta-structure being visible.
If my filesystem gets compromised (stolen, confiscated, etc.) and I use pass, the infiltrators will know that I have a password that I labeled "slrpnk.net". They won't have access to the password itself, but they'll be able to determine all the services I have accounts at.
Ok, you might be technically correct, as this is not literally what's said in the article. Guess hyperbole isn't allowed on c/politicalmemes /s.
It was still a fascist salute and the article states in its friggin headline that the phrase and how Ukraine deals with its ultranationalist figures is problematic.