Separate scanned PDF per person, as an image, no OCR, 3MB in size
How did this picture happen
This is so absurd, fancy outfit, hair, gun, computer
Art.
Hahaha Windows users having sense
have no idea how to install another OS
Funny how he praises immutable Arch + KDE and then uses Ubuntu (Snaps, broken packages, themed GNOME, not immutable)
I hope he finds his way to Bazzite, Aurora or plain Kinoite, as this would suit him way better
So hardware manifacturers need to adapt to XOrg now? LOL the reason that some apps dont scale right even on Plasma is that they are probably not Wayland native yet.
And GNOME still doesnt have stable fractional scaling, unlike Plasma.
Hardware vendors shouldnt need to adapt to GNOME too.
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7054#issuecomment-1916315391
They auto download binaries, even proprietary ones, unsigned and without user interaction.
YEAH security!
I mean of course, they never shipped big parts of their orders but got the money anyways.
That company is fucked up completely.
A library is paid though.
Donate to your instance, and decentralize the Fediverse.
In short: all are Crap, use UBlockOrigin
(ABP is worse, Adguard "intelligently shows ads", Ghostery is spyware)
- proprietary server (snap store), unlike flatpak
- snapd only allows one server (but it is foss so you could just patch it), unlike flatpak
- nonexistent security on snap store, multiple times malware, unlike flatpak
- no sandboxing without apparmor and specific profiles, so not cross platform, unlike flatpak
- the system apps are also requiring apparmor, so not cross platform
- they lack granular permission systems afaik
- they concur with flatpak, which is horrible as we need a universal packaging format, not 3
- seemingly no reproducible builds?
- no separation between all, opensource, verified repo, unlike flatpak
- they pollute the mount list with all the loop devices
And people complain abour resource usage etc, but that is just separating apps from the system. Flatpak does the same.
We plan to run programmatic research to reduce risk in decision-making so that users benefit when our stakeholders translate user insights into product development.
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
Edit: I see the point of studies, which are not needed. But especially, feeding users stuff their stakeholders want, is a crazy thesis.
Their users are their biggest stakeholders, arent they? Or is it Google?
That phrasing tells me its Google.


Crazy! Did the small chinese hight come from malnourishment or hard labor? Otherwise that increase would be hard to describe right?