[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 39 points 4 weeks ago

I think it's still an interesting question whether this feature should be enabled by default (and most people seem to agree it should be).

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Most offer it, but often not for the regular consumer contracts.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The alternative is to get your ISP to offer you a static IPv6 and a reverse DNS PTR entry for your IPv6, like I asked for in the initial post. Some ISPs do if you offer them more money, some only do if you offer them more money and a legit business registration, apparently a few rare ones do it for free, and some never do it.

Once you got the static IP, you can point DNS directly to yourself, and there's no VPS or anything in between. Browser traffic and so on directly comes to your machine.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

While I agree on a practical level, and pragmatism sure is important, long term that workaround still keeps you paying for cloud services and gives cloud companies an easy way to directly man-in-the-middle your traffic. So I'm hoping one day the situation will improve.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

I feel like downtimes are a badge of honor for self-hosting in some ways. Being more efficient and minimal means there will be slightly less redundancy and that can be a good thing. Perfect uptime to avoid lost revenue during downtime is a capitalist craze, and not how an ecological project should operate.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

It causes way more traffic for the DNS server to use a shorter TTL, so yes, it does incur more DNS traffic. In Germany some providers will disconnect you regularly if you stay connected for too long.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

understandable. how dare you change your schedule without advance notice to the cat monarchs of the household :-o

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Some ISPs require changes ever 24 hours and will disconnect you if needed. Also, if you set DNS to cache such a short amount of time that you can react to that in 5 minutes, you will incur way more DNS traffic which can become a problem when your site is busier. Also, even if your DNS TTL is set to a super short value, a web search suggests to me in practice there will likely be downstream clients and networks that ignore it and won't really update in such a short time frame.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago

Even in an ideal DNS setup, you're probably going to have downtimes whenever your dynamic IP changes. If only because some ISPs even force-disconnect you after a while to change your address.

94
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ellie@slrpnk.net to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

(Sorry if this is too off-topic:) ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services, or at least I feel like that. And it endlessly frustrates me.

The reason is even though IPv6 addresses are widely available (unlike IPv4), most ISPs won't allow consumers to request a static rather than a dynamic IPv6 prefix along with a couple of IPv6 reverse DNS entries.

Instead, this functionality is gatekept behind expensive premium or even business contracts, in many cases even requiring legal paperwork proving you have a registered business, so that the common user is completely unable to self-host e.g. a fully functional IPv6-only mail server with reverse DNS, even if they wanted to.

The common workaround is to suck up to the cloud, and rent a VPS, or some other foreign controlled machine that can be easily intercepted and messed with, and where the service can be surveilled better by big money.

I'm posting this since I hope more people will realize that this is going on, and both complain to their ISPs, but most notably to regulatory bodies and to generally spread the word. If we want true digital autonomy to be more common, I feel like this needs to be fixed for consumer landline contracts.

Or did I miss something that makes this make sense outside of a big money capitalist angle?

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 months ago

I honestly thought this was a real headline before seeing the source.

[-] ellie@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 years ago

oof, that's just sad. i hope people switch, firefox is actually not that bad these days

view more: next ›

ellie

joined 2 years ago